Erin Pizzey
December 16 at 6:22am near Twickenham, United Kingdom ·
Why did no one take any action when Adam Lanza was so obviously a frightened little boy living with a mother who had an arsenal of guns. The baby sitter said he had tantrums that were abnormal. He behaved as though he might have been abused. No one questioned his behaviour. Had he been living with a single father I believe action would have been taken to help him very early on. His mother knew he was explosive yet she gave him access to an arsenal of guns. She has some explaining to do.
.........................
Vernon Beck I too, share your thought Erin. I am currently assisting a 14 year old boy who was abducted to Canada by his mother and then put into a well known psychiatric institution by the local children's aid society where he was told that he had better love his mother and hate his father or never get out. His mother is a psychologist in this country and knows how to play the system to her advantage.
This boys story is chilling and will be released soon. Years of abuse by the mother with the assistance of the child protection industry in Canada which in general hates fathers. Heads will roll in Canada over this.
The abuse by this professional in Canada against her own children reminds me of Adam. One must question as to what the mother did to this boy to make him hate her so much as to make him want to murder her. I do not believe that children kill parents without an underlying cause.
December 16 at 6:50am · Like · 4
Julie Noble Unfortunately as you say Vernon, some people know how to play system and those that can appear outwardly in control and functioning well can put off people who might otherwise have reported worries and concerns. Also the children of these people are less likely to be believed, so the NSPCC told me some years ago. Sadly, Adam was horribly frustrated by his situation, but why feel the need to take the children and the teachers too, why not confine it to his own parent and himself?
December 16 at 6:57am · Edited · Like
Michael Hogan The real question is how has society reached the point where it creates such angry, violent young people!?
Brenda Anne Spencer was the first schoolyard murderer way back in -1979 . I lived close to the school she shot up. Sir Bob Geldof wrote a song about it -- while the families were still reeling from the shock; Geldof was cashing in! I've never forgotten that: the senseless killing -- and Geldof writing that horrid song! Every time I see that man I cringe!
We need to stop glorifying these murderers - we all know the name of the killer (it's a household name now); but we don't really know the names of the victims!
We had a young man here in Australia kill 15 other young kids using petrol. (The Childers Backpacker Massacre of 2000)! That barley made the news - not sensational enough I guess!?
Sadly we live in a sound bite culture that wants easy answers and a quick fix. It's much more complex than that!
Until we acknowledge the underlying social problems that lead to these people acting out, the bloodshed will continue!
December 16 at 7:17am via mobile · Like · 3
Fred Mason I heard he was on Ritalin?I think our country is the only one to put school boys on this drug. What does it do to them over time?The Columbine mass killers were on it also. Some would argue that feminist teachers encourage the use of it to make boys girl like and easier to teach.
December 16 at 7:43am · Edited · Like · 3
Fred Mason Erin our first funeral is this Tuesday. I have no idea how I will hold up. Two of my friends children are dead. The animal lined them up against a wall and shot them point blank we are told. My god the fear going through them their last moments of life. I am glad I am Connecticut this week instead of my Keys.What the hell would a locked door do for security when there is a big glass window next to it?
December 16 at 7:34am · Like
Deborah Kendrick Madness begets madness. Let's STOP reacting to the symptoms with fear based solutions and start focusing on the disease of a SICK SOCIETY.
December 16 at 8:04am · Like · 2
Amber Domoradzki His mother is dead. She has no explaining to do.
December 16 at 8:04am · Like
Menelik Charles He killed his mother and masses of children...killing their innocence as his was killed by his mother. This lad needed saving from his own mother...that much is now clear.
Instead he acted out his own 'soul murder' by killing his persecutor, the innocence he once possessed (in the children he slaughtered) and then his physical self...
A tragedy which could and should have been averted if society had not blinded itself the the sins of the mothers against their on children.
December 16 at 8:25am · Like · 3
Vera Jones How many times have I heard the comment following divorce that 'the kids will be fine'. Parents should value their children and put them first.
December 16 at 8:30am · Edited · Like
Deborah Kendrick We have to become more aware of the subtle signs of mental illness - and then not procrastinate or be afraid to take action. Mental illness is not a situation where one sees something a bit off-kilter and thinks maybe they should wait around and see what develops.
December 16 at 8:32am · Edited · Like · 2
Rico Rock The thing that gets me is the level of fear that these beautiful innocent children would have experienced along with the heart wrenching efforts of the women who tried to protect them ;-(
December 16 at 8:40am · Like
LostSoul Pete I'm convinced that too many children are misdiagnosed as being/having bipolar. Then the EXPERIMENTATION begins, as the psychiatrists try different drugs. When they become worse, the dosage is increased. These decisions are often made after an appointment that lasts only minutes (yet is billed at an extravagant rate). We need better coordination between psychologists and psychiatrists. Far better understanding. Far less stigma. More responsible prescribing of drugs. And we need to stay vigilant.
December 16 at 8:43am · Like · 1
Fred Mason I am going to ask Obama tonignt what we could do to get fathers back in childrens lives and strenthen nuclear families. The nut group Westboughor Babtist Chuch will there tonight also. I will keep al posted.
December 16 at 8:44am · Like · 2
Menelik Charles @ LostSoul Pete...I agree in part...what these kids needed was psychotherapy as opposed to psychotropic drugs. Also what was probably needed most of all was better coordination between therapists and social workers to look into claims this lad was abused by the person who gave birth to him. This is a fact which was crucially overlooked.
December 16 at 8:46am · Like · 1
Menelik Charles Fred Mason...they could do two things right now: 1) cut welfare benefit for moms and 2) bring home American jobs so young men in the inner cities and elsewhere can do them instead of wasting theirs and other people's lives selling drugs brought in by the CIA so as to fund the 'Black ops' overseas.
Just my two bob.
December 16 at 9:40am · Edited · Unlike · 3
Derrick Corr A mind has the ability to travel down many roads; without the proper direction it easily gets lost. Moral compasses are bequeathed to children by their parents and others in their lives. But even in the most positive of environments a rare one gets lost on their own.
December 16 at 10:23am via mobile · Like
Mark Hansel Menelik Charles you sound like a libertarian, but i like what you said as we all know what the CIA is really about.
December 16 at 10:55am · Like
Mark Hansel Obamaism does not care about kids - The Obama you don't know. - Few if any of his predecessors took the oath of office with higher public hopes for his success than President Obama on Jan. 20, 2009. Millions of Americans hailed his election as an end to partisanship, a renewal of the spirit of compromise and a reinvigoration of the nation's highest ideals at home and abroad. Obama has become a sharply polarizing figure. His admirers believe he deserves a special place alongside Wilson, the Roosevelts and LBJ as one of the architects of benevolent government. Many American's believe he is trying to remake America in the image of Europe's social democracies, replacing America's ethos of independence and individual enterprise with a welfare state inflamed by class divisions, and the removal of freedoms and liberty's on a great level, including getting rid of the 2nd amendment. In an effort to get a clearer picture of Obama -- his shaping influences, his core beliefs, his political ambitions and his accomplishments -- Obama has presented himself to the world as many things, including radical community organizer, idealistic civil rights lawyer, dynamic reformer in the Illinois and U.S. senates, and, finally, the cool presidential voice of post-partisan hope and change. With his air of reasonableness and moderation, he has projected a remarkably likable persona. Even in the midst of a historically dirty campaign for re-election, his likability numbers remain impressive, as seen in a recent AP-GFK Poll that found 53 percent of adults have a favorable view of him. But beyond the spin and the polls, a starkly different picture emerges. It is a portrait of a man quite unlike his image, not a visionary reformer, but rather a classic Chicago machine pol who thrives on rewarding himself and his friends with the spoils of public office, and who uses his position to punish his enemies and American family's. The War Criminal Obamaism has destroyed many family's world wide in his fake wars, that left many mothers and their children dead. As for Self-Inflation at the Expense of Sacred Psychiatry Disorder and Psychiatric Insanity
December 16 at 11:13am · Edited · Like · 1
Menelik Charles Well, Mark, I do sort of like Ron Paul, so yeah, I guess I am a bit lol
December 16 at 10:57am · Unlike · 1
Mark Hansel Well i am glad to hear that Menelik, as i am a libertarian who doesn't like that globalists and governments have destroyed family's and children lives with their Marxist agenda's, in order to have total control over people's lives.
December 16 at 11:02am · Unlike · 6
Erin Pizzey I am so sorry for your friend. They must be in agony to know their children were in terrible fear. For parents and grand parents to out live their children Is such an unnatural event . The school and his father have to answer "why when the boy was so obviously disturbed did no one put out a hand to help the child? There has to be an answer. I hold the school and the father guilty of neglect, neglect that left the children and teachers to die.
December 16 at 11:48am · Like · 1
Menelik Charles I wasn't aware the father was involved in the lad's life. but if he knew of these issues...well
December 16 at 11:56am · Like
Irv Salos The answer to your question Erin is that money and jobs in the field of of what they call "Mental Hygiene" are valued at a level of priority that is far too low.
December 16 at 1:24pm · Like · 1
Michel O. Willekens Encore un jeune terroriste qui vivait sans père !
Il a tué sa mère, il a tué 20 enfants de 6 à 7 ans... et il a tué 6 adultes !
Tant de tueries en Amérique... sans se poser des questions sur les motifs de ces tueurs... alors que nous savons que 80% des adolescents délinquants sont privés de vivre avec leurs pères... (ou avec leurs mères?) à la suite de conflits de ruptures !
Bravo aux médias fascistes qui parlent de la vente d'arme libre aux USA en oubliant les situations familiales de fond. Sacrés salopards.
See Translation
December 16 at 2:46pm · Like
Si Tailor @mark hansel.... We are nearly there it's going to be called union of soviet socialist europe. USSE
December 16 at 3:06pm via mobile · Unlike · 2
Attila Vinczer Sadly Erin, as in this case, people are less apt to question a mother. As an avid advocate for the rights of children and families, I see this as a condition of impunity over and over again.
December 16 at 3:07pm · Like · 1
Erin Pizzey So do I.
December 16 at 3:08pm via mobile · Like · 2
Attila Vinczer What is coming to clear focus is we are living in social chaos. The family unit has been torn apart and children are having to endure the uncertainty and stress of divorce. Every other family is broken and many children are unable to cope. Some snap and do terrible things to themselves or others. Some are put on Ritalin to mask behavioural issues. In Canada 8 men and one woman will commit suicide each and every day. We need to look at the root causes of our social demise, not just the superficial symptoms. I am very concerned about the path we are on. Children deserve to be raised by a loving mother and a loving father, in a loving home. This is no longer the norm as it once was.
December 16 at 3:18pm · Like · 2
Attila Vinczer I rescued my two boys from an abusive alcoholic mother. It has taken tremendous work to repair the damage that was done. She was supported by York CAS and failed to protect our children and take proper steps to do so. When I uncovered a detailed murder plot against me, the York Regional Police said they would not even talk with the mother. They said, "You are a big boy and you can take care of yourself!" i was shocked and told the cops that while I can take care of myself, I have no chances of doing so when I am asleep. This same child talked about stabbing teachers, but the cops had NO concerns about it.
December 16 at 3:42pm · Like · 1
Fred Mason I just left the memorial ceremony with the president. I was able to sit 12 seats behind him. I had a stern looking secret service guy standing next to me the entire time. Obama spoke for about ten minutes after clergy from all of Newtowns religious spoke. The President did not mingle with the crowg of people and just left via the back door.
December 16 at 6:52pm · Like
Michael Cohn And precisely what action do you think "someone" should or could have taken ?
December 16 at 7:11pm · Like
Michael Cohn Additionally, his mother cannot explain anything in that she happens to be quite dead.
December 16 at 7:12pm · Like
Fred Mason There is nothing anyone can do from preventing sick people from crashing or breaking into a school and start killing children and teachers. This school had a strong steel door that was locked between exits and entrances. The killer just broke the window next to it and entered the school. There is no way to put into words the pain on the family members faces. You could not see it on tv but it was heartbreaking.
December 17 at 6:06am · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn As a mental health professional, I think that most people have NO idea how difficult it is to commit someone to a mental institution and keep them there for any length of time. Most people have no idea how undervalued and underpaid the entire field of mental health is. Most people don't even *believe* in mental illness - they believe in ridiculous concepts like "evil" and "badness" and believe that mentally ill people need to be locked up, not treated. Most people think you can "fix" mental illness, if it even exists, with pills. You CANNOT. So when things like this happen, all of a sudden people like me become temporarily valuable. I expect to be valuable for about one more week before it all reverts to the same old thing.
December 16 at 8:11pm · Like · 3
Michael Cohn And idiots like Mark Hansel want to talk...politics. You guys never stop, do you ?
December 16 at 8:13pm · Like
Mark Hansel Wow I really struck o-cord, and you say you’re a professional, while resorting to name calling, that is, calling me an idiot Michael Cohn, the fact is the whole profession of junk (quack) science called Self-Inflation at the Expense of Sacred Psychiatry Disorder and Psychiatric Insanity, you can't refute. It is common knowledge that more harm is done to kids with so called people who call themselves doctors and using their so called position in having to resort to drugging up children which has caused more harm then good, is a known fact.
The industry of modern psychiatry has officially gone insane. Virtually every emotion experienced by a human being — sadness, grief, anxiety, frustration, impatience, excitement — is now being classified as a “mental disorder” demanding chemical treatment (with prescription medications, of course) IE (Big Pharma drugs that cures all that ails you).
The new, DSM-5 “psychiatry bible,” has transformed itself from a medical reference manual to a testament to the insanity of the industry itself. “Mental disorders” named in the DSM-5 include “General Anxiety Disorder” or GAD for short. GAD can be diagnosed in a person who feels a little anxious doing something like, say, talking to a psychiatrist. Thus, the mere act of a psychiatrist engaging in the possibility of making a diagnoses causes the “symptoms” of that diagnoses to magically appear.
This is called quack science and circular reasoning, yet it’s indicative of the entire industry of psychiatry which has become such a laughing stock among scientific circles that even the science skeptics are starting to turn their backs in disgust. Psychiatry is no more “scientific” than astrology or palm reading, yet its practitioners call themselves “doctors” of psychiatry in order to try to make quackery sound credible. How modern psychiatry really works Here’s how modern psychiatry really operates: A bunch of self-important, overpaid intellectuals who want to make more money invent a fabricated disease that I’ll call “Hoogala Boogala Disorder” or HBD. By a show of hands, they then vote into existence whatever “symptoms” they wish to associated with Hoogala Boogala Disorder. In this case, the symptoms might be spontaneous singing or wanting to pick your nose from time to time. They then convince teachers, journalists and government regulators that Hoogala Boogala Disorder is real — and more importantly that millions of children suffer from it! It wouldn’t be compassionate not to offer all those children treatment, would it? Thus begins the call for “treatment” for a completely fabricated disease. From there, it’s a cinch to get Big Pharma to fabricate whatever scientific data they need in order to “prove” that speed, amphetamines, pharmaceutical crack or whatever poison they want to sell “reduces the risk of Hoogala Boogala Disorder.” Serious-sounding psychiatrists — who are all laughing their asses off in the back room — then “diagnose” children with Hoogala Boogala Disorder and “prescribe” the prescription drugs that claim to treat it. For this action, these psychiatrists — who are, let’s just admit it, dangerous child predators — earn financial kickbacks from Big Pharma. In order to maximize their kickbacks and Big Pharma freebies, groups of these psychiatrists get together every few years and invent more fictitious disorders, expanding their fictional tome called the DSM. The DSM is now larger than ever, and it includes disorders such as “Obedience Defiance Disorder” (ODD), defined as refusing to lick boots and follow false authority. Rapists who feel sexual arousal during their raping activities are given the excuse that they have “Paraphilic coercive disorder” and therefore are not responsible for their actions. (But they will need medication, of course!)
You can also get diagnosed with “Hoarding Disorder” if you happen to stockpile food, water and ammunition, among other things. Yep, being prepared for possible natural disasters now makes you a mental patient in the eyes of modern psychiatry (and the government, too). Former DSM chairperson apologizes for creating “false epidemics” Allen Frances chaired the DSM-IV that was released in 1994. He now admits it was a huge mistake that has resulted in the mass overdiagnosis of people who are actually quite normal. The DSM-IV “…inadvertently contributed to three false epidemics — attention deficit disorder, autism and childhood bipolar disorder,” writes Allen in an LA Times opinion piece. He goes on to say: The first draft of the next edition of the DSM … is filled with suggestions that would multiply our mistakes and extend the reach of psychiatry dramatically deeper into the ever-shrinking domain of the normal. This wholesale medical imperialization of normality could potentially create tens of millions of innocent bystanders who would be mislabeled as having a mental disorder. The pharmaceutical industry would have a field day — despite the lack of solid evidence of any effective treatments for these newly proposed diagnoses. All these fabricated disorders, of course, result in a ballooning number of false positive. As Allen writes: The “psychosis risk syndrome” would use the presence of strange thinking to predict who would later have a full-blown psychotic episode. But the prediction would be wrong at least three or four times for every time it is correct — and many misidentified teenagers would receive medications that can cause enormous weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy.
But that’s the whole point of psychiatry: To prescribe drugs to people who don’t need them. This is accomplished almost entirely by diagnosing people with disorders that don’t exist. And it culminates in psychiatrists being paid money they never earned (and certainly don’t deserve.) Imagine: An entire industry invented out of nothing! And yes, you do have to imagine it because nothing inside the industry is actually real. What’s “normal” in psychiatry? Being an emotionless zombie. It wouldn’t be compassionate not to offer all those children treatment, would it? Thus begins the call for “treatment” for a completely fabricated disease. From there, it’s a cinch to get Big Pharma to fabricate whatever scientific data they need in order to “prove” that speed, amphetamines, pharmaceutical crack or whatever poison they want to sell “reduces the risk of Hoogala Boogala Disorder.” Serious-sounding psychiatrists — who are all laughing their asses off in the back room — then “diagnose” children with Hoogala Boogala Disorder and “prescribe” the prescription drugs that claim to treat it. For this action, these psychiatrists — who are, let’s just admit it, dangerous child predators — earn financial kickbacks from Big Pharma. In order to maximize their kickbacks and Big Pharma freebies, groups of these psychiatrists get together every few years and invent more fictitious disorders, expanding their fictional tome called the DSM. The DSM is now larger than ever, and it includes disorders such as “Obedience Defiance Disorder” (ODD), defined as refusing to lick boots and follow false authority. Rapists who feel sexual arousal during their raping activities are given the excuse that they have “Paraphilic coercive disorder” and therefore are not responsible for their actions. (But they will need medication, of course!)
You can also get diagnosed with “Hoarding Disorder” if you happen to stockpile food, water and ammunition, among other things. Yep, being prepared for possible natural disasters now makes you a mental patient in the eyes of modern psychiatry (and the government, too). Former DSM chairperson apologizes for creating “false epidemics” Allen Frances chaired the DSM-IV that was released in 1994. He now admits it was a huge mistake that has resulted in the mass overdiagnosis of people who are actually quite normal. The DSM-IV “…inadvertently contributed to three false epidemics — attention deficit disorder, autism and childhood bipolar disorder,” writes Allen in an LA Times opinion piece. He goes on to say: The first draft of the next edition of the DSM … is filled with suggestions that would multiply our mistakes and extend the reach of psychiatry dramatically deeper into the ever-shrinking domain of the normal. This wholesale medical imperialization of normality could potentially create tens of millions of innocent bystanders who would be mislabeled as having a mental disorder. The pharmaceutical industry would have a field day — despite the lack of solid evidence of any effective treatments for these newly proposed diagnoses. All these fabricated disorders, of course, result in a ballooning number of false positive. As Allen writes: The “psychosis risk syndrome” would use the presence of strange thinking to predict who would later have a full-blown psychotic episode. But the prediction would be wrong at least three or four times for every time it is correct — and many misidentified teenagers would receive medications that can cause enormous weight gain, diabetes and shortened life expectancy.
But that’s the whole point of psychiatry: To prescribe drugs to people who don’t need them. This is accomplished almost entirely by diagnosing people with disorders that don’t exist. And it culminates in psychiatrists being paid money they never earned (and certainly don’t deserve.) Imagine: An entire industry invented out of nothing! And yes, you do have to imagine it because nothing inside the industry is actually real. What’s “normal” in psychiatry? Being an emotionless zombie. The only way to be “normal” when being observed or “diagnosed” by a psychiatrist — a process that is entirely subjective and completely devoid of anything resembling actual science — is to exhibit absolutely no emotions or behavior whatsoever. A person in a coma is a “normal” person, according to the DSM, because they don’t exhibit any symptoms that might indicate the presence of those God-awful things called emotions or behavior. A person in a grave is also “normal” according to psychiatry, mostly because dead people do not qualify for Medicare reimbursement and therefore aren’t worth diagnosing or medicating. (But if Medicare did cover deceased patients, then by God you’d see psychiatrists lining up at all the cemeteries to medicate corpses!) It’s all a cruel, complete hoax. Psychiatry should be utterly abolished right now and all children being put on mind-altering drugs should be taken off of them and given good nutrition instead. When the collapse of America comes and the new society rises up out of it, I am going to push hard for the complete abolition of psychiatric “medicine” if you can even call it that. Virtually the entire industry is run by truly mad, power-hungry maniacs who use their power to victimize children (and adults, too). There is NO place in society for distorted psychiatry based on fabricated disorders.
The whole operation needs to be shut down, disbanded and outlawed. The lost notion of normalcy Here are some simple truths that need to be reasserted when we abolish the quack science industry of psychiatry: Normalcy is not achieved through medication. Normalcy is not the absence of a range of emotion. Life necessarily involves emotions, experiences and behaviors which, from time to time, step outside the bounds of the mundane. This does not mean people have a “mental disorder.” It only means they are not biological robots. Nutrition, not medication, is the answer Nutritional deficiencies, by the way, are the root cause of nearly all “mental illness.” Blood sugar imbalances cause brain malfunctions because the brain runs on blood sugar as its primary energy source. Deficiencies in zinc, selenium, chromium, magnesium and other elements cause blood sugar imbalances that result in seemingly “wild” emotions or behaviors. Nearly everyone who has been diagnosed with a mental disorder in our modern world is actually suffering from nothing more than nutritional imbalances. Too much processed, poisonous junk food and not enough healthy superfood and nutrition. At times, they also have metals poisoning from taking too many vaccines (aluminum and mercury) or eating too much toxic food (mercury in fish, cadmium, arsenic, etc.) Vitamin D deficiency is ridiculously widespread, especially across the UK and Canada where sunlight is more difficult to achieve on a steady basis. But the reason nutrition is never highlighted as the solution to mental disorders and illness is because the pharmaceutical industry only makes money selling chemical “treatments” for conditions that are given complicated, technical-sounding names to make them seem more real. If food and nutritional supplements can keep your brain healthy — and believe me, they can! — then who needs high-priced pharmaceuticals? Who needs high-priced psychiatrists? Who needs drug reps? Pill-pushing doctors? And Obamacare’s mandatory health insurance money confiscation programs? Nobody needs them! This is the simple, self-evident truth of the matter: Our society would be much happier, healthier and more productive tomorrow if the entire pharmaceutical industry and psychiatry industry simply vanished overnight. With the DSM-5, modern-day psychiatry has made a mockery of itself. What was once viewed as maybe having some basis in science is now widely seen as hilarious quackery. Psychiatry itself now appears to be completely insane. And that might be the first accurate diagnosis to come out of the entire group. Invent your own fictitious diseases! By the way, you can be your own psychiatrist right here, right now! Simply use my handy-dandy Disease Mongering Engine which randomly generates real-sounding mental disorders!
December 17 at 12:23am · Edited · Unlike · 2
Psychiatry EXPOSED!
Psychiatry EXPOSED!
December 17 at 12:26am · Unlike · 2 · Remove Preview
Mark Hansel Mind Games: Prozac, Depression, and the Mind - The adverse effects of Prozac can be traced to the drug's effect on brain chemistry. As Peter R. Breggin, M.D., explains in Talking Back to Prozac: What Doctors Aren't Telling You About Today's Most Controversial Drug, Prozac acts as a stimulant to the nervous system.6 Therefore, it can produce side effects that mimic those of amphetamines and are exaggerations of the desired effects of Prozac in relieving depression.
According to Dr. Breggin, the FDA psychiatrist who wrote the agency's safety review of Prozac stated that the drug's effects--including nausea, insomnia and nervousness--resembled the profile of a stimulant drug, rather than a sedative.7 Dr. Breggin adds that nearly all of the side effects of Prozac listed in the Physician's Desk Reference "fit into the stimulant profile." Among others, these stimulant symptoms include headaches, nervousness, insomnia, anxiety, agitation, tremors, weight loss, nausea, diarrhea, mouth dryness, anorexia and excessive sweating.
In short, a drug that acts as a stimulant also can overstimulate the body systems. In his book, Dr. Breggin offers the example of a person who takes Prozac to relieve depression (the beneficial effect) and suffers from agitation and insomnia (the negative effects). These adverse effects "are inherent in the stimulant effect that produces feelings of energy and well-being," Dr. Breggin writes. "In this sense, the difference between 'therapeutic effects' and 'toxic effects' are merely steps along a continuum from mild to extreme toxicity."9
With that in mind, what follows is a discussion of some of the side effects that have been associated with Prozac:
Mind Games: Prozac, Depression, and the Mind
December 17 at 12:28am · Unlike · 2 · Remove Preview
Christina Zaba Wow.
December 17 at 1:44am via mobile · Like
Christina Zaba But: kind and effective healing strategies, correctly applied, do work over time. Here, the mother needed deep help. This is how it ends - so tragic. We need to change our whole way of life. I hope we do.
December 17 at 1:46am via mobile · Like · 1
Mark Hansel Our government is supposed to be the potent, omnipresent teacher, but what are they teaching us all, that government murder in phony wars is good on family's and children. It teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a law-breaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. If Government want to remove guns off it citizen's and do away with the 2nd amendment because of these shootings in schools, then they the government needs to get rid of it's guns first and learn to be a peace keeping nation. Is that going to happen, no, governments are to corrupt and promote death. Ask yourself why are people lose their rights, if someone (crazy on big pharma drugs) does something horrible, it because the governments want your liberty's and freedoms, that is what a totalitarianism government do. Prozac and its family of psychotropic drugs are at the heart of 99% off mass murder shootings. The media also hypes victim disarmament zones like public brainwashing centers as a great place for Prozac and Zoloft heads to kill. They always go to the place with no guns so they can take there time. Guns don’t kill people kook psychologist pushing SSRI do.
Now you see this quack Mayor Bloomberg is leading the charge to take away guns in the wake of the Newtown child murders. The pressure is on. Apart from grandstanding, which Bloomberg knows how to do, this is all about deflection from the main event: the killer himself. Last night, I watched network coverage, wherein, of course, the anchors were in Newtown, standing on the street, “trying to make sense of the whole thing.” If they’re so interested, along with the public, in figuring out why Adam Lanza killed all those children, you would think, with their enormous resources, they would find out who Lanza’s doctor-psychiatrist was in five minutes and ask him about his patient. Of course, that’s sacred ground. Patient-doctor confidentiality. Except the patient is dead.
So much for the networks wanting to know who Adam Lanza really was. It’s all a sham. They just want to keep asking the question over and over, pretending to be in the dark about the whole thing. They want to “deepen the mystery” and emphasize how futile it is to get into the mind of a killer. They’ve got that rap down. They use it every time one of these mass murders happens. They know about the psychiatric-drug connection to murders and suicides. But they won’t say the magic words. They’ll just keep biting their tongues. And “out of respect for the victims,” the drug companies aren’t running ads anywhere near this media coverage. Translation: the companies don’t want to encourage the public to make the connection between meds and murder. Prozac, murder. Zoloft, murder. Paxil, murder. Ritalin, murder. Bloomberg is playing the shill for new gun control. He’s the point man of the moment, insisting “the president do something meaningful” right now. It’s an orchestrated little play. Meanwhile, the public is under the spell of mass hypnosis. Can’t stop watching the tube. Never stops to think, “Hey, why don’t they put Lanza’s doctor on the screen and have him talk about his patient?” It is now being implied that because Marsha Lanza was “self-reliant,” had readied herself for an “economic collapse,” and was proficient with firearms, that this rubbed off on her son and was a driving force behind the massacre. The obvious inference being made is that anyone who buys storable food, owns firearms and is knowledgeable about societal and economic threats is potentially a mass murderer who needs to be watched very carefully, which is a meme that has already been making the rounds in recent months. Because Marsha Lanza owned ten guns this means she somehow “stockpiled weapons” as part of her “paranoid” fantasies about doomsday. It’s particularly cynical that Marsha Lanza’s lifestyle is being subtly blamed for the murder of 20 children given that she was the very first victim of Adam Lanza’s rampage.
Yahoo 7 News reports that, “Investigators are turning towards Nancy Lanza’s supposed identification as a survivalist,” as one of the contributing factors towards the shooting. The stabbing of 23 children over in China last week is also being fed into the talking point, with reports that the killer Min Yongjun was “psychologically affected” by doomsday predictions. How long is it before the establishment begins to parrot the line that preppers are suffering from a “psychological disorder” and need to be prevented by law from owning guns?
Preppers are a prime target for the establishment because they represent the polar opposite of collectivists. With increasing numbers of Americans becoming self-sufficient, a system that draws its power from overly dependent people is naturally inclined to demonize preppers. So-called “doomsday preppers” have come under increasing scrutiny in recent months. In early November, 46-year-old Terry Porter became a target for undercover police in Maryland as a result of a neighbor telling cops that he had guns, had made anti-Obama statements, and was a “prepper”. After cops uncovered a 20-year-old drug conviction, Porter was raided by 150 heavily armed police and arrested. We have previously documented the fact that so-called “preppers,” who given the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy should be being lauded by the authorities as a good example to other Americans, are now being treated as terrorists.
Flyers aimed at Military Surplus stores produced under the auspices of the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism project earlier this year characterized bulk buying of food – a staple of prepper behavior – as a potential terrorist activity. Earlier this year we also reported on the case of David Sarti, who was featured in National Geographic’s Doomsday Preppers show. Sarti visited his doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert authorities, before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list that stripped him of his second amendment rights. The idea of taking away guns from all the law abiding citizens while concentrating them in the hands of deranged, psychopathic criminals isn’t my idea, however. It’s Obama’s. And Bloomberg’s. And Nancy Pelosi and everybody else who is now pushing for “gun control” legislation in the wake of the Newtown, Conn. elementary school shooting. The problem with gun control laws is that only law-abiding citizens follow laws. This should be self-evident. So while a gun ban law would see law-abiding citizens turning their guns in, law-abiding citizens are not the source of violent shootings. It’s the psychopathic criminals who are committing the violence. And because they are criminals, they will by definition ignore gun ban laws. Want proof? Well, for starters, it’s already against the law to shoot children and kill them. Yet Adam Lanza did exactly that in Newtown, Conn., oblivious to what the law says. All by itself, this is proof that laws do not stop criminal-minded psychopaths from committing acts of violence. Strictest gun control areas have the most violent crime. Remember all this when you hear all the usual political suspects call for “gun control legislation.” This legislation will, by definition, only hurt law-abiding citizens who would never even think of harming innocent children. At the same time, gun control laws will do absolutely nothing to stop psychopathic criminals from using guns, knives or other weapons to commit mass violence. Proof of this is readily apparent. “One of the interesting characteristics of mass shootings is that they generally occur in places where firearms are [already] banned: malls, schools, etc,” writes professor Glenn Harlan Reynolds in a USA Today opinion piece. “That was the finding of a famous 1999 study by John Lott of the University of Maryland and William Landes of the University of Chicago, and it appears to have been borne out by experience since then as well. Renolds goes on to expose the “big lie” of gun control: the idea that criminals will abide by “gun-free zones” or laws of any kind. The very premise of being a criminal is that they ignore laws.
If anything, gun-free zones are “a magnet for mass shooters,” explains Reynolds. And he’s right: Aurora, Colorado had some of the most stringent gun control laws in America. But instead of reducing gun crime, all it did was ensure that victims were completely disarmed and unable to shoot back. None of this logic and reason, of course, will stop people like President Obama from trying to punish law-abiding citizens across America by taking from them their right to armed self defense. Then again, gun control advocates never claimed to have any basis in logic or reason. They have habitually resorted to fear and contrived emotions to try to push their disarmament agenda, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that gun control causes MORE crime, not less. As history has shown, mass disarmament leads to even more deaths via government violence against unarmed citizens.
Senior Correspondent John Miller sets us up for the punch line: “It’s about the process. She had to go to an awful lot of trouble to get these guns. CT has some of the toughest gun laws in the country. That meant going down to the state police, filling out the forms, getting finger printed, and then waiting to hear back that she was approved for a handgun permit. Then it meant going down to the store and getting an FBI background check, waiting for another period and picking those weapons up. So it’s not one of those things where you just show up with your driver’s license and make a purchase. She made an affirmative effort to get these weapons and as we learned from the landscaper, enjoyed shooting.”
Ready? Here is John Miller’s punch line: “We spoke to another relative who also said she was worried about the defense of her home if there was a collapse of the economy [on screen - close up casual photo of Mrs. Lanza]. She wanted to have weapons on hand to defend them which of course only underscores the irony that those were the guns used by her own child to kill her and so many others.”
Meanwhile, the police in Newtown are lying. Here is how that plays out. We are entering another familiar phase of the standard mass-murder scenario. It goes like this: “A portrait is beginning to emerge of the killer…” With Adam Lanza, it starts with “loner, shy, awkward, different, very smart.” It now proceeds to “goth, computer nerd, carried briefcase not backpack, played video games.” The latter terms are meant to connect the audience, the public, to the 1999 Columbine School mass murders, the touchstone of school shootings, the gold standard. The so-called “trenchcoat mafia”; Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the “goth shooters.” Next, we may hear Adam Lanza was bullied. These are all synthetic descriptions about Lanza, manufactured to cue the audience to make certain assumptions about a person they don’t know at all. The “emerging portrait” is a necessary step in the media presentation. It assures the public that they can make at least partial sense out of the killer. It’s also a false trail, if in fact the killer was on psychiatric meds, because then all bets are off. The drugs (Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Ritalin, Adderall, etc.) do things to the brain that result in actions entirely beyond any description of Lanza, even when that description comes from family and friends. Now, the police are getting into the act. Connecticut State Police Lieutenant, Paul Vance, dangled a carrot in front of the press today: “Our investigators at the crime scene…did produce some very good evidence in this investigation, that our investigators will be able to use in, hopefully, painting the complete picture as to how—and more importantly why—this occurred.” A note from Adam Lanza, found at the scene? A recording of a confession? Vance didn’t say. Perhaps his punch line will come tomorrow. Here’s why this is a lie. Killing your own mother, and then breaking into a school and killing 26 people, most of whom are very young children, doesn’t, by any stretch of the imagination, resolve by assigning a motive. There is no motive that can explain such a crime. Lanza was bullied, so he killed 26 people, including little children? He had a very bad experience when he was in school? His mother was brutal toward him?
But the media and law-enforcement presentation requires some sort of motive. It’s part of the planned sequence of events that occurs in the aftermath of mass murders. It needs to be there. The public is supposed to digest this motive and either accept it or grudgingly acknowledge it might have played a role in the killings. It’s better than a vacuum. The public is not supposed to be left with a vacuum. Of course, the television anchors button the whole thing up with their somber, high-minded, and world-weary bottom-line reminders that “we may never understand what really happened here on the morning of December 14th.” That’s folded in to provide the “helpless factor” that’s now engraved on every mass murder.
“We’re all victims and we have to accept what cannot be explained.” We’re talking about multiple vectors of explaining a killer. Planned vectors. “Well, he was this way and he was that way, and so-and-so person said he was this way, and at the end of the day all this helps but there is still an underlying mystery about the human mind that researchers are only beginning to probe, and here is Dr. Such and Such, who has been researching the deep corridors and channels of the brain for thirty years at Harvard, to try to help us make some sense of out of all of this…Doctor?”
Smokescreen. Meanwhile, if Adam Lanza was on psychiatric drugs, the answer is obvious. HE HAD NO MOTIVE FOR KILLING ALL THOSE PEOPLE. There was no motive. That’s what the drugs do. Yes, a person might be angry, might be resentful, might feel put-upon, might fantasize about revenge, might wish that people were dead…but he would never act on those feelings and thoughts. That’s the whole point. And then he takes the drugs, or dangerously withdraws from them, and THEN he kills people. He does what he would otherwise never do. In fact, some people who feel absolutely no desire for revenge, after taking the drugs kill others or themselves or both. Dr. Joseph Tarantolo has written about the case of Julie Marie Meade. In a column for the ICSPP (International Center for the Study of Psychiatry and Psychology) News, “Children and Prozac: First Do No Harm,” Tarantolo describes how Julie Meade, in November of 1996, called 911, “begging the cops to come and shoot her. And if they didn’t do it quickly, she would do it to herself. There was also the threat that she would shoot them as well.” The police came within a few minutes, “five of them to be exact, pumping at least 10 bullets into her head and torso.”
Tarantolo remarks that a friend of Julie said Julie “had plans to make the honor roll and go to college. He [the friend] had also observed her taking all those pills.” What pills? Tarantolo called the Baltimore medical examiner, and spoke with Dr. Martin Bullock, who was on a fellowship at that office. Bullock said, “She had been taking Prozac for four years.” Tarantolo asked Bullock, “Did you know that Prozac has been implicated in impulsive de novo violence and suicidalness?” Bullock said he was not aware of this. Tarantolo is careful to point out, “Violent and suicidal behavior have been observed both early (a few weeks) and late (many months) in treatment with Prozac.” Keep in mind that a person doesn’t have to be severely “down” to be given one of these antidepressants. He or she could just be going through a temporary disappointment, but upon recommendation, a visit to a psychiatrist is made…and then life takes a radically different and extremely dangerous pharmaceutical course. As far as motive for murder in the Adam Lanza case, everything is backwards. First, the police should be investigating whether he had been under the care of a physician. If so, what drugs were prescribed? If the psychiatric meds are positively established, then all the rest of the mumbling and hinting and explaining and writing script is completely irrelevant. Lanza went crazy from the drugs and he killed. He took the drugs and he killed.
This is not an excuse. It’s a fact. It doesn’t change the tragedy, but knowing it can prevent more mass murders, if the people trying to cover up what these drugs do can be pushed out of the way and shelved, along with all the other medical liars in this country. Meanwhile, we’re getting the full dose of media mind control out of Newtown, Connecticut. The planned sequence is playing out. Here’s the capper: Newtown USA is the perfect town. Everybody is happy there. It’s the best place to live. People are friendly. There is virtually no serious crime. It’s so safe. It’s Christmas season. Decorations have already been hung in the streets. It’s the wonderful holiday in the wonderful community. Everybody likes everybody. What’s the takeaway? If this horrible, horrible thing happened in Newtown, no one is safe in America, anywhere. Who wants to promote that message? The same people who promote the imminent threat of terrorism, in order to wipe out freedom, to install wall to wall surveillance of everything we do and say and write, 24/7, to remove guns from citizens, to increase dependence on government for life and survival. One young man, on one or two medicines, goes on a rampage and kills, and the planners advance their heinous cause: Operation Newtown. As long as we stay asleep.
December 17 at 10:40am · Edited · Like
Mark Hansel Prozac and its family of psychotropic drugs are at the heart of 99% off mass murder shootings. The media also hypes victim disarmament zones like public brainwashing centers as a great place for Prozac and Zoloft heads to kill. They always go to the place with no guns so they can take there time. Guns don’t kill people kook psychologist pushing SSRI do.
http://youtu.be/h5I6XdSbwUQBan Prozac And Other Mass Murder Drugs Not Guns!
Prozac and its family of psychotropic drugs are at the heart of 99% off mass murder shootings. The media also hypes victim disarmament zones like public brai...
December 17 at 10:52am · Like · Remove Preview
Michael Cohn Hansel, I called you an idiot for injecting politics into the discussion when you decided to take the opportunity to bash Obama yet again If you actually took the time to read the rest of what i wrote, you would see that i wasn't advocating the use of drugs at all, although they can be somewhat useful in a very limited number of situations. As for the the remainder of your rant, I will take it for what it is - the uninformed opinions of a layperson who sounds a lot like a Scientologist. You cannot blame mental health people for what Adam Lanza did, as he had no mental health care. You can really only blame him and probably his mother.
December 17 at 11:29am via mobile · Like
Mark Hansel lol's Cohn, You don't get it do you, and it too bad I struck a nerve with you. I think you got a nerve attacking myself for political views, when you willfully ignore the facts of government political propaganda being used to remove more rights of it's citizen's. I brought political views into this discussion as that is what the mainstream media and Obamaism government and Obama's fake tears did and are pushing, with Senator's, Congress member's and even mayor's are doing with this shooting, in order to remove the 2nd amendment off law abiding citizen's. The Mainstream media pushes anti-gun agenda, while ignores lawful gun owners stopping other mass shootings in the same week, hmmm interesting. Did you get that, no, well no big surprise there.
I am going to give you two things to think about, The Constitution and what it means, and the blaming of mental health people who spend a great deal of time pushing big pharma drugs on children, that cause people to kill. No one said you did and if you do, well there you go. The later I already explained, you can disagree all you want, but what you say, does it make it true, no it doesn't, but don't let facts stop you from pushing your emotional diatribe. The fact is the whole profession of junk (quack) science pushing Sacred Psychiatry Disorder and Psychiatric Insanity is just that, quack science. The video's say it all, even by those in your profession, oh I don't rant, I give facts as the come forward.
Just as the government decided it wants to be a leader on these shootings, by removing law abiding citizen's rights, then if that is the case, Governments must give up all it guns it uses on the world in murdering children and families sir in US government phony wars for globalist bankers.
MSNBC host calls for disarming the American people and attacking the Constitution, while Media blackout on lawful gun owners stopping mass shootings, too busy pushing gun control. Like most liberals and other government-lovers, is completely brain-dead when it comes to the Second Amendment. It was added not to ensure the rights of duck hunters and plinkers, but as a last resort to fend off a tyrannical government. George Mason, considered one of the founding fathers of the Bill of Rights, said disarming the people is “the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” This is precisely what liberals want to do – disarm the American people, as tyrannical government is inconceivable. Gun confiscation is not about saving children. It’s about the government having its way with us. It’s about slavery, my good man. Wake up.
When an armed man opened fire on a crowded shopping mall in Oregon last week, 22-year-old Nick Meli pulled out his concealed carry permitted gun, and took cover in a store before taking aim. “I know after he saw me, I think the last shot he fired was the one he used on himself,” Meli reported of the gunman’s suicide that followed to KGW News Channel 8. Two people died at the hands of the shooter before the man took his own life, but many more could have lost their lives in Oregon that day had Meli not been there. Yesterday in San Antonio, Texas, two people were wounded in another movie theater shooting before an off-duty officer took the gunman down, wounding him and effectively ending the murder spree before anyone else could get hurt. As with other shootings stopped by lawfully armed citizens, news about these two incidents has been widely limited to local media outlets and seemingly ignored otherwise. Why the mainstream blackout? Even though the media has struggled with reporting the actual facts of the Connecticut shooting, all the national news outlets seem to have time to publish are propaganda pieces pushing gun control. In Reuters this morning, one headline reads, “In Newtown, an Anguished Debate over Gun Rights, Controls,” and the subhead reads, “Two days after a gunman opened fire in a Connecticut elementary school, killing 26 people, several dozen parents and children gathered in a circle at Newtown’s public library to draw something positive from the town’s sudden, tragic notoriety” (emphasis added). CNN’s Don Lemon used his airtime this morning to go on an anti-gun tirade, claiming mental health issues are secondary to gun availability.
News outlet Salon went to task posting gun control stories and targeting preppers on its site and official Twitter account all weekend, even writing a hit piece on Alex Jones. In “What’s a Prepper?,” Salon’s Katie McDonough notes, “Preppers believe having weapons is just as important as having enough water. They are also deeply suspicious of government overreach, sounding Tea Party-like…” The Atlantic‘s Senior Editor Robert Wright offered, “A Gun Control Law that Would Actually Work,” going beyond the assault weapons ban Senator Dianne Feinstein has promised she will introduce during Congress’ first 2013 session. Wright calls for a ban on any gun that can hold more than six bullets. Feinstein is not alone, either; USA Today is reporting “the most prominent pro-gun member of Congress” with an NRA “A” rating Senator Joe Manchin has announced the horrific mass shootings have “changed” him. Manchin is now calling for more control on public firearm purchasing power.
MSNBC asked, “Is the American Public Ready for Gun Control?” Politico gave us, “The Price of the Second Amendment,” presenting the argument that the lives of the children in Connecticut are what we must pay to have the right to keep and bear arms. The Christian Science Monitor declared, “Madison Never Meant Second Amendment to Allow Guns of Sandy Hook Shooting.” Anti-gun op-eds abound. The Huffington Post published, “Gun Control and Mental Health Funding—If Not Now, When?” and “The Real 2nd Amendment Isn’t the NRA Version.” The Washington Post posted, “Now Is the Time for Meaningful Gun Control.” Following an outcry on social media sites this weekend, the Discovery Channel announced its show “American Guns” was also canceled.
In the wake of the Connecticut tragedy, a White House.gov citizen petition for “legislation that limits access to guns” put up the day of the school shooting is already up nearly 146,000 signatures in just three days, breaking the record for the most-signed petition on the government’s site. People across the nation have also flocked to gun buyback programs to willingly turn their guns in. Even the National Rifle Association has fallen silent on social media sites, reportedly taking down its Facebook page and not responding on Twitter since the shooting.
“Here’s the real newsflash folks—they’re coming for our guns. Make no mistake.” Although our government is responsible for the Fast and Furious gun walking scandal that put guns in Mexican drug cartel hands that have since resulted in thousands of deaths, and Obama’s drone strike kill list is reportedly responsible for the murders of nearly 200 children among thousands of dead innocents in the Middle East, the president somehow found the ability to wipe away fake tears at a press conference following the Connecticut school shooting. In the Newtown massacre fallout, an all-out war has been declared on We the People’s right to keep and bear arms. The mainstream media has politicized the Connecticut school shooting to the point that using the tragedy to demonize the 2nd Amendment has seemingly become an Olympic event. Where is the supposedly objective media now to report on the other examples of guns in the hands of properly permitted American citizens saving people’s lives? Declaring we need stricter gun laws and to repeal the 2nd Amendment is synonymous with saying, “We want criminals and the government to be the only ones armed in America.” Because if our legal arms are stripped from law-abiding citizens, the only people who will have guns will be the government and the criminals. The problem is, the line between the two is so blurry, it’s nearly impossible to tell who is who anymore.
“The lessons of history are numerous, clear and bloody. A disarmed population inevitably becomes an enslaved population. A disarmed population is without power, reduced to childlike obedience to—and dependence upon—the organs of a parental state. A disarmed population will lose—either piecemeal or in one sweeping act—those basic rights for which the citizens of America risked their lives and fortunes over two hundred years ago.” Over the weekend, the liberal website Daily Kos ran a poll asking if gun confiscation is do-able, revealing that Democrats and other “progressives” are at least thinking about stealing guns from law-abiding Americans (the liberals never take into consideration how many cops will be killed in the process). The idea of compensating firearms owners fits right into the liberal pathology – stealing money from one segment of society and giving it to another after the government steals something from them.
So in reality Sir, You can take your hope and change lord king Obama, the death cultist of madman, that murders innocent people in others country's and supports terrorists and keep him,
I bash Obamaism because he really is nothing but a tin pot, third rate dictator, who hates freedoms and liberty's. It's plain to see your so fascinated with Obamaism that you shout those who oppose the agenda of Barack Obama — or rather oppose the agenda of his globalist handlers — should be rounded up and imprisoned, just like singer and “social activist” Harry Belafonte recently told the ambulance chaser Al Sharpton on the death merchant General Electric’s network, MSNBC as well as many other liberal talking heads in the media.
The Obamaism government admits Al Qaeda “amongst” Syrian rebels, recognizes them as the “legitimate representative of the Syrian people.” Even Moscow surprised by US recognition of Syrian opposition terrorists, Al Qaeda the same terrorists who killed American soldiers in Iraq. Decision to recognize Syrian opposition ignores international pledge to begin dialogue on Syria’s political future. So why would I give a dam about a man who cares nothing for children, fathers, or even families, as he is too busy murdering families in other parts of the world. He made it very clear where he stands on liberty's and the very freedoms American do not want to give up, well except the liberal talking heads. As expected, after a long pause of feigned “consideration,” the US has recognized the militants (Al Qaeda) it has been arming, funding, aiding logistically and supporting diplomatically since as early as 2007, as the “legitimate representatives of the Syrian people,” with the added caveat, “in opposition to the Assad regime.” The overt, extremist nature of the militants operating in Syria has become increasingly difficult for the West to paper over. Torrents of videos and confirmed reports documenting militant atrocities, including several involving the machine gunning of bound prisoners, and a particularly gruesome video of a child handed a sword by militants to hack off the heads of bound men wearing civilian clothing, has confirmed the worst fears expressed by geopolitical analysts and foreign governments around the world – that the Syrian opposition is in fact Al Qaeda. This could explain why western governments hate it's citizen's freedoms and liberty's as law bidding citizen's are being deemed terrorists now by western governments as everyone in their eyes is suspect.
December 17 at 1:32pm · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn Please get some help. Your thinking is very impaired and you are not making sense at all.
December 17 at 2:04pm · Like
Michael Cohn I would comment further but feeding the troll is a bad idea. That said, you apparently do not or cannot read what others say. This is not your personal forum. However - you can start your own blog and perhaps you should.
December 17 at 2:09pm · Like
Mark Hansel Oh here we go, the liberal taking head shouts "Please get some help. Your thinking is very impaired and you are not making sense at all." or I would comment further but feeding the troll is a bad idea. That said, you apparently do not or cannot read w...See More
December 17 at 2:38pm · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn You make a lot of assumptions about what people do - and don't do. Be careful of libeling anyone please - you won't like the results.
December 17 at 2:50pm · Like · 1
Mark Hansel Gee Cohn, you should take your own advice, maybe pop a couple of pills, why your at it. I took screen shot of your comments, so your baseless threats mean nothing to myself as a journalist, i write all kinds of stuff and get people like you all mad at...See More
December 17 at 3:11pm · Like
Michael Cohn Wow. You truly are a scary guy.
December 18 at 1:19am · Like
Mark Hansel Wow, you seem more scary yourself. Think about it, while you might immediately assume that the Ph.D. degree in making your assumptions yourself, somehow makes you feel better, I have to ask, is that what they teach you in Psychology in order to shove p...See More
December 18 at 9:21am · Like
Michael Cohn You obviously cannot be reasoned with as you spew your vitriol. I am going to take my own advice about feeding trolls.
December 18 at 9:52am via · Like · 1
Mark Hansel Cohn, i realize you have problems grasping reality on what is taking place in society today and wish to remain in denial because you can't debate the facts or truth and that ok, run away, but using political correctness will not make people trust you o...See More
Will Obama Cry For Children He Has Killed With Drones?
Obama on record has killed thousands of children in 8 nations with drones attacks, will he break up in tears for them? Did Obama only cry for the shooting vi...
December 18 at 10:26am · Edited · Like · Remove Preview
Aimee McGee Mark Hansel, while I agree that there is a vast industry selling sickness, please do not throw out the baby with the bath water. For people like myself the SSRI/SNRI classes of drugs have been quite literally life changing. Whereas my grandfather needed ECT (and took voluntary admissions about every 15 months to be treated) for his depression, all my immediate family have benefitted from these drugs. One thing though, we were all started on these meds as adults. As for Ritalin, having supported two adult men to diagnosis of ADHD, the effect of this medication on the right candidates at the right dose is remarkable. It's about using these meds selectively and as adjuncts to other measures, not to use them as primary treatment modalities
December 18 at 1:03pm via mobile · Like
Michael Cohn Aimee, good luck with this. Mark believes that SSRI's cause people to become serial killers, and that eating right solves all problems. Sigh. I have to believe that he either had a *very* bad experience with mental health people, or that he is just a bit demented. Not sure which, don't much care.
December 18 at 2:28pm · Edited · Like
Mark Hansel Aimee McGee, while i have no problem with "adults who consent" to whatever treatment they think might help them, that is their right. My point that i make is fair, and what i have seen is to many people's lives destroyed, children's lives destroyed, because they get labeled and misdiagnosed all to often in order that the use of big Pharma drugs are pushed on them, and where I draw the line is the medical professional's giving mind altering drugs to children, that do more harm then good, as it is a billion dollar boondoggle, that benefits only those in the profession who make monies off it or who either have stocks or an vested interest in getting kick backs like doctors do, many who I have confronted and have admitted it.
Two studies published recently suggest there could be something wrong with the way ADHD is diagnosed in young children in the US, one found that nearly 1 million kids are potentially misdiagnosed just because they are the youngest in their kindergarten year, with the youngest in class twice as likely to be on stimulant medication, while the other study confirmed that whether children were born just before or just after the kindergarten cutoff date significantly affected their chances of being diagnosed with ADHD. Papers on both studies by US researchers are in press, to be published in the Journal of Health Economics, the first being a corrected proof that was first available online in June, and the other appeared online on 4 August. In the first paper, Dr Todd Elder, assistant professor of economics at Michigan State University, looked at a sample of nearly 12,000 children from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Cohort, which is funded by the National Center for Education Statistics. He analyzed the difference in ADHD diagnosis and medication rates between the youngest and the oldest children in a kindergarten grade. He found that the youngest children were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD and to be prescribed behavior-modifying stimulants such as Ritalin than their older classmates. He told the press that the “smoking gun” was that the diagnoses depended on the children’s age relative to classmates and the teacher’s perceptions of whether they had symptoms. Elder said: “If a child is behaving poorly, if he’s inattentive, if he can’t sit still, it may simply be because he’s 5 and the other kids are 6.”
“There’s a big difference between a 5-year-old and a 6-year-old, and teachers and medical practitioners need to take that into account when evaluating whether children have ADHD,” he urged. Elder said medicating such children inappropriately was a cause for concern not just because of the effect of long term stimulant use on their health, but also because it costs a lot of money: he estimated about 320 to 500 million US dollars is being wasted on unnecessary medication of young children for ADHD, of which 80 to 90 million is funded by Medicaid.
From his analysis, Elder found that the youngest kindergarten kids were 60 per cent more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD than the oldest in the same grade, and also, by the time those groups reached the fifth and eighth grades, the youngest were more than twice as likely to be on prescription stimulants. Elder estimated that overall in the US, the misdiagnosis rate is about 1 in 5, that is around 900,000 of the 4.5 million children currently diagnosed with ADHD have been misdiagnosed.
December 18 at 3:09pm · Edited · Like
Mark Hansel Michael Cohn that is the problem with you, or anyone who corrects your unfounded claims, or has different opinions, or state facts or truths, is somehow according to you in need of professional help... And I quote your words, which in itself show what you really are about..a spin doctor. "And idiots like Mark Hansel want to talk...politics. You guys never stop, do you ?"....or ..."Hansel, I called you an idiot for injecting politics into the discussion", .... "As for the the remainder of your rant, I will take it for what it is - the uninformed opinions of a layperson who sounds a lot like a Scientologist.".....or...."Please get some help. Your thinking is very impaired and you are not making sense at all."....or....."This is not your personal forum"....or..... "You make a lot of assumptions about what people do - and don't do. Be careful of libeling anyone please - you won't like the results"....or "Wow. You truly are a scary guy."....or.... "You obviously cannot be reasoned with as you spew your vitriol. I am going to take my own advice about feeding trolls."...."Aimee, good luck with this. Mark believes that SSRI's cause people to become serial killers"
So as a so called doctor I can only assume that you are an angry man who dislikes anyone confronting your livihood, as any doctor who may have prescribe psychotropic drugs to kids, need his license to practice taken away for good. Let me tell you about this, not that you would care anyhow, but, Seven-year-old Gabriel Meyers didn’t want soup for lunch one Thursday in April, 2009. When his 23-year-old foster brother sent Gabriel to his room for dumping his soup in the trash, Gabriel threatened to kill himself. He kicked his toys around his room, then locked himself in the bathroom. Police reports say Gabriel was home sick that day from his elementary school in Margate, Florida, under the care of Miguel Gould, his foster father’s son. Around 1 p.m., city police responded to Gould’s frantic 911 call and found Gabriel had hanged himself. A troubled child who had previously suffered from neglect, sexual assault and abusive parenting, Gabriel spent the previous year shuttling among several foster parents while taking a constellation of anti-psychotic medicines, including Lexapro and Vyvanse, to control his depression and "ADHD" attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Like most children in Florida foster care, Medicaid paid Gabriel’s medical expenses. Just one month before his suicide, Gabriel’s doctor prescribed him Symbyax, an anti-depressant restricted for treatment of children. The medication’s FDA-required label features a warning that use of the drug by children or teenagers can lead to suicide. Symbyax does not meet criteria established by Congress for Medicaid reimbursement, so it is illegal for Medicaid to pay for a prescription of the drug to a child. Sohail Punjwani, the doctor who prescribed Symbyax for Gabriel, received a stern letter from the FDA about his history of over-prescribing mental health drugs. This is what happens day in and day out by so called doctors giving big pharma drugs to children, something all parents need to have a serious look at and stop going along with.
All I can say Cohn do something with your anger...
December 18 at 3:21pm · Like
Michael Cohn And your qualifications to hold all of your many opinions are ? The only person here that sounds remotely angry is you. I personally find you amusing if somewhat tedious.
December 18 at 4:00pm · Like
Michael Cohn Not to mention somewhat obtuse and certainly one who has absolutely no idea what an ad hominem fallacy is.
December 18 at 4:01pm · Like
Mark Hansel You don't need qualifications to hold opinions found in medical journals to reiterate your own professions opinions. As for personal attacks, that is less dangerous, then those doctors over medicating children with dangerous big pharma drugs, that kill or make kids commit suicide with self serving diagnoses. As for the rest of your lame claims, either stop taking your own medications or at least, stop being annoyingly insensitive to understand what happens when rights and freedoms are violated by government by shootings and the state takes control over people's lives.
December 18 at 4:24pm · Like
Psychiatry EXPOSED!
Psychiatry EXPOSED!
December 18 at 4:35pm · Like · Remove Preview
Mark Hansel Psychotropic Drug Abuse in Foster Care Costs Government Billions
State foster care programs and child protective services have had mixed success addressing the pervasiveness of dosing their clients with prescription psychotropic drugs. Using federal Medicaid money to purchase dangerous prohibited prescriptions for children, which cost the government up to $600 per dose, is technically a violation of the law. Now, the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, chaired by Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), has asked the Government Accountability Office to look into the drugging of foster care children. The investigators will attempt to account for estimates in the hundreds of millions of dollars of possible fraud arising from prescriptions for drugs explicitly barred from Medicaid coverage. The GAO is collecting data from Oregon, Massachusetts, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota and Texas, to search for patterns of abuse. This effort marks the first time suspicion of Medicaid fraud related to psychotropic drugs has been examined at the federal level. According to Senate staffers working on the investigation, the committee will likely hold hearings on the matter later this year. Psychotropic medications act on the central nervous system and alter brain function, mood and consciousness. The GAO investigation is chiefly focused on anti-depressants, widely used in foster care in dangerous combinations, and for so-called "off-label" uses to treat symptoms for which they have not been medically approved. Anti-psychotic medications have been a factor in a number of children's deaths.
Statistics on psychotropic drugs in foster care have until now come out in scattered reports, mostly from investigations of foster care failures by individual states. For example, in 2003 a Florida Statewide Advocacy Council study found that 55 percent of Florida's foster children were being administered psychotropic medications. Forty percent of them had no record of a psychiatric evaluation. Another Florida report also indicated anti-psychotic medication use increased an astonishing 528 percent from 2000 to 2005. A Texas state study in 2004 revealed that 34.7 percent of Texas foster children were prescribed at least one anti-psychotic drug -- and 174 children aged 6-12 in the care of the state were taking five or more psychotropic medications at once. Last April, an investigation by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution exposed several companies operating foster care homes in Georgia repeatedly used anti-psychotic medications to "subdue" children in their care. Despite being cited repeatedly, none of the agencies were fined more than $500. According to child care experts and assessments by both advocacy groups and state government agencies, many states lack efficient records management and adequate oversight of foster care, contributing to a pervasive lack of medical continuity for the children. Social workers have oversized caseloads of foster children, who are often shunted between families and prescribed anti-psychotics from doctors unfamiliar with their medical histories. Without a case history, experts and foster care alumni say, doctors are more likely to add medications than take them away, resulting in record numbers of children dispensed several anti-psychotic medications at once. In many cases, the drugs are prescribed off-label to youngsters with behavior problems. Julie Zito is a professor of pharmacology at the University of Maryland who conducted a 2008 study of the Texas foster care system that found 41 percent of the children prescribed psychotropic drugs received three or more different medications. She told Politics Daily what little research has been done suggests children in foster families are rarely assessed properly, a failure leading to serious effects. There has been no research on multiple-drug regimens, Professor Zito explained, and "blitzes" of medication have become a pervasive way of dealing with behavior problems in foster care. "We've expanded the medication practice in response to children not getting better," she said, and children who fail to improve, "are getting more medication." Pharmaceutical companies manufacturing psychotropic drugs have played a major role in encouraging their increased use on foster care clients. Drug companies participate in aggressive marketing, conduct misleading research about efficacy and safety, and in some cases, "bribe" psychiatrists to prescribe their drugs, according to Zito and Jim Gottstein, an Alaska lawyer and founder of the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, who has mounted several lawsuits against pharmaceutical corporations.
For example, last year the St. Petersburg Times reported that a psychiatrist in Jacksonville, Florida, was paid for speaking engagements to encourage her to prescribe Seroquel, a drug used to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, and a neurologist in Tampa received free trips to Spain and Scotland from AstraZeneca, the drug's British manufacturer, for her innumerable prescriptions of the drug for headaches. Seroquel is the top-selling anti-psychotic drug in the United States, with more than $4 billion per year in worldwide sales. AstraZeneca recently paid $520 million to settle lawsuits -- some brought by doctors who had been offered swag in exchange for prescriptions -- over its illegal promotion of off-label uses for Seroquel. According to Jim Gottstein, the increase of anti-psychotic use in foster care amounts to "drug companies sacrificing children's lives on the altar of corporate profits." Gottstein recently filed a citizen's suit on behalf of the state of Alaska against several doctors, drug companies and insurance companies, claiming that they knowingly promoted Medicaid fraud. Reform Attempts
In response to the devastating study of the Texas system in 2004, that state's top health agency introduced a new set of guidelines stressing specific treatment goals for medication and "informed consent" of parents and guardians. That effort led to decreased use of psychotropic drugs relative to the number of children enrolled in foster care from 2002 to 2009, according to data from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. In May 2005, Florida expanded foster parents' rights to reject psychotropic treatment for the children in their care. Four years later, however, a review found that the new requirements were being flauted, and the panel that investigated Gabriel Meyers' suicide concluded that every level of the Florida system had missed "warning signs" that Gabriel's care was inadequate. Thirteen percent of Florida foster children were on one or more psychotropic drug, and 16 percent of those were not approved by parents or guardians. In 2008, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.), the only psychiatrist in Congress, introduced a bill titled Invest in KIDS Act, which included stronger oversight for prescription medications in foster care. McDermott held a hearing on the use of psychotropic drugs in foster care, but the bill died in committee. Near the end of George W. Bush's second term, Congress passed a law, co-sponsored by McDermott, that included increased oversight for "mental health" in foster care, but did not specifically mention psychotropic drugs.
"Some children in foster care may need and benefit from psychotropic medication," McDermott told Politics Daily. "But these drugs should not be used as a shortcut to treat foster children when more effective treatments, including counseling, might provide long-term benefits." Federal and state agencies have pursued drug companies that illegally market their drugs for off-label uses, a practice that experts say heavily contributes to the overuse of psychotropic drugs in foster care. Last year, a Justice Department action against Pfizer led to a $2.3 billion settlement, the largest in the department's history. Companies convicted of major health fraud are barred from participating in Medicaid and Medicare. But worrying that a conviction would cause Pfizer to fail and cost its employees their jobs, the government allowed Pfizer's shell company, which exists solely to plead guilty in lawsuits, to be charged instead, and the drug company paid a fine. Pfizer maintains that it did not break the law. In 2006, The New York Times obtained a batch of internal documents that showed Eli Lilly, the maker of Zyprexa, a medication approved exclusively for treating the severe mental illnesses of schizophrenia and bi-polar disorder, was suppressing information on the drug's harmful side effects and advertising it illegally. Lilly paid $62 million to settle lawsuits with 32 states and the District of Columbia, and agreed to ensure that its marketing complied with the law. How to Fix It
The problems that lead to drug abuse in foster care are complex and deeply entrenched, but activists and advocates have proposed a number of solutions for limiting the overuse of anti-psychotics. Foster care experts, including a current task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, believe that getting foster children a "medical home" -- one physician who manages their care over the long term and has access to relevant records -- would reduce the overprescription of psychotropic medications. "Having a drug to take the edge off the pain and fear and sadness saved my life a time or two, but it's not a lifestyle." said Misty Stenslie, a former foster child who is currently the deputy director of Foster Care Alumni of America. Children under the protection of government agencies deserve the assurance of safe and decent health care. Especially, as Stenslie points out, "We can't give kids what they really need, and that's a family and love."
Filed Under: Investigations, Health Care, PD Investigations, Medicine
December 18 at 4:40pm · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn You certainly are very good at quoting others. What you aren't so good at is critically evaluating the things you quote as "truth." This has a lot to do with what I suspect is your lack of formal education.
December 18 at 6:29pm · Like
Aimee McGee Mark Hansel, we agree about adult consent. We also agree that children should not be medicated unless all other options have been tried. Where is the argument?
My family doctor prescribes my meds now with me self adjusting dose. Last psychiatrist I saw...See More
December 18 at 10:49pm via mobile · Like
Mark Hansel lol's Aimee, you no got no argument from me. I glad you questioned their opinion, as that is all it is. Merry Xmas and all the best in the new year.
December 19 at 10:18am · Like
Mark Hansel Cohn, I been referring to you in social media news circles, as the on-line, “The Doctor”, as you got to be the first internet doc, I ever seen, who really has over stepped his professional ethic's, first you try to use online internet medical diagnosis, “which failed” and now you want to use the socialist claim called; "the non-education factor." I will say sir, I did have a dam good laugh at that one. I guess you didn't get the memo... where Popular non fiction draws the reader into another world; as it doesn’t spend time convincing the reader how smart the author is. You should think about that.... Can you think of more beliefs about the your PhD which you might be carrying as ‘excess baggage’? But then, you are entitled to your opinion, as that is all it is, just an opinion your profession uses, in order to keep the made up diseases going, that in the end just helps big pharma to sell it horrible mind altering drugs on kids.. Just keep in mind, if you ever desire to drug children up for one of those made up diseases, just don't do it. You could create another monster child, who goes out and kills people, due to big pharma medications prescribed. Oh and Merry Xmas Cohn, I wish you luck in the new year.
December 19 at 11:23am · Like
Michael Cohn If you cause any damage to my professional reputation, or cause me any economic damage, you can expect to be hearing from my attorneys and you can probably expect a lawsuit for defamation of character. Your accusations are groundless and have no basis in fact, and I am, at this point, asking you to desist forthwith.
December 19 at 12:37pm · Like · 1
Mark Hansel Oh please Cohn, take your worthless excuses and opinionated threats out for a walk in the cold to cool your jets, i did legal work for 14 years in the supreme court in Canada mister, as i told you before, you better grasp what laws are really about, ev...See More
December 19 at 3:41pm · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn Legal work by someone who does not even know the difference between slander and libel ? You are a sad joke. Go ahead now, get in your last word.
December 22 at 6:03am via mobile · Like
Erin Pizzey These comments are not appropriate on my Facebook. I am talking about a damaged boy who went on to massacre other children and adults. Here we. Have a rancourous discussion with threats between two men. Please take your anger elsewhere.
December 22 at 10:30am via mobile · Like · 9
Adam Klein It is clear was in a very bad environment and there was absolutely no men in his environment in the end and in his school as well. He did grow up with both parents but his parents divorced in 2008 which was initiated by Nancy. The husband however while...See More
December 22 at 10:58am · Like
Adam Klein Also suicide bombers have a similar profile of weak father which could be more then that but that is what they foundin Israel studying failed suicide bombers. Didn't have any reason to live in this world which combined with other factors make them very dangerous because the people on top do love this world
December 22 at 11:01am · Like
Teri C. Stoddard I may be wrong, but from the little bit I've read I think the mom did the best she could. It seems she realized that she could no longer do it alone and was going to put him in a program. That may be what set him off.
December 22 at 11:09am · Like · 1
Mark Hansel Erin, You say your talking about a damaged boy who went on to massacre other children and adults, and I gave examples of what causes a lot of this stuff, as the truth is coming out about this issue and the strange facts showing there is more to this story then most realize. But at the same time is being used to punish law abiding citizen's and their freedoms and liberty's at the same time. Something most people don't give a dam about or even bother to talk about or wonder why, when these types of shooting are used by governments and the mainstream media to hype the removal of a Constitution itself in dismantling a country.
Maybe if people paid more attention in pointing out how children commit suicide or murder 99% of the time by being over medicated, and misdiagnosed with psychotropic drugs given to kids by the industry of modern psychiatry, which in my opinion has officially gone insane. People might see a pattern that is created in the first place, that got a so called doctor all bent out of shape, because that is his livelihood.
Maybe Erin, you should be looking into psychotropic drugs given to kids by the industry of modern psychiatry. Virtually every emotion experienced by a human being — sadness, grief, anxiety, frustration, impatience, excitement and anger — is now being classified as a “mental disorder” demanding chemical treatment (with prescription medications, of course) IE (Big Pharma drugs that cures all that ails you). The “psychiatry bible,” has transformed itself from a medical reference manual to a testament to the insanity of the industry itself. “Mental disorders” named in the DSM-5 include “General Anxiety Disorder” or GAD for short. GAD can be diagnosed in a person who feels a little anxious doing something like, say, talking to a psychiatrist. Thus, the mere act of a psychiatrist engaging in the possibility of making a diagnoses causes the “symptoms” of that diagnoses to magically appear.
I am entitled to my opinion, I have no anger what so-ever, as I will stand up for what I believe in that i have found out in my research. Thank you Erin for your comments.
December 22 at 11:14am · Like · 1
Warren Gibson Hello Erin Pizzey,I'm new to your fb friend list,I have been a careworker (Spec needs kids)fro 15 years,mostly Autsitic/Aspergers,in that time I have never met any Boy who would have the Capacity or Hatred to such attrocoties,
December 22 at 11:30am · Like
Steven DeLuca Good call Erin. There is enough hostility around us without spewing it where people are trying to figure out how to stop violence. Why did she have his room in the basement with all those guns down there knowing he really didn't have the same emotions and thoughts that most of us have. If for no other reason she might fear he would commit suicide as so many displaced young men do and want to protect him from that.
December 22 at 11:33am · Like · 1
Warren Gibson From what I have read the Boy may have been abused by His Mum,he may have been "Disturbed"I woud not jump to an unqulified conclusion he had Aspergers/Autism..my laptop is playing up sorry..
December 22 at 11:38am · Like
Michael Lucas Erin it is because she is the mother and no one wanted to question her as a good mother but the father would have been under fire from day one.
December 22 at 11:43am · Like · 3
Fred Mason Erin, I am still in Connecticut. I have not seen so many little white coffins in my life. Hurst after hurst, the roar of the 100 Harley Davidson police escorts. To answer your question, mothers sometimes put their head in the sand . They do not want to believe that their child may be out of control and violent.
December 22 at 12:52pm · Like
Mark Hansel Steven DeLuca wrote; Good call Erin. There is enough hostility around us without spewing it where people are trying to figure out how to stop violence. Why did she have his room in the basement with all those guns down there knowing he really didn't ha...See More
Ban Prozac And Other Mass Murder Drugs Not Guns!
Prozac and its family of psychotropic drugs are at the heart of 99% off mass murder shootings. The media also hypes victim disarmament zones like public brai...
December 22 at 1:30pm · Edited · Like · 1 · Remove Preview
Michael Cohn The problem is, we don't know what she knew or didn't know, and we have no idea what she intended to do or not do. The truth is that we know nothing whatever about her except that she had some guns, which may or may not be meaningful. We also have ab...See More
December 22 at 3:11pm · Like
Steven DeLuca I read Prosaic Backlash (Or a book by a similar title) I am X military police, I have a gun, Colt 45, permit, etc. I have worked with teens in treatment facilities and I know that those kids along with veterans in our wars are drugged up. Big Pharm is...See More
December 22 at 7:22pm · Unlike · 1
Michael Cohn Everyone is an expert on something we know nothing about...
December 22 at 8:07pm · Like
Mark Hansel Steve DeLuca, thanks for your comments, as some of us do know what the score is, no matter how they want to hide the facts or ignore it, either willfully or for profit.
What I post is too educate others who may not know or understand, while the mains...See More
December 22 at 10:22pm · Like
Warren Gibson As an Ast Nurse/Careworker,I can atest to the fact many Psyc Drug's can have negitive side effects,on certain people,each persons history inc any other Medications should be taken into account before taking these Meds,
December 23 at 11:00am · Like
Mark Hansel Top 10 Legal Drugs Linked to Violence - It’s no surprise that Adam Lanza was on heavy-duty pharmaceuticals, as was Aurora shooter James Holmes, the Columbine shooters, Ted Kaczinski the Unambomber, and many more. Many of the drugs handed out to troubl...See More
Monday at 10:32am · Like
Michael Cohn I thought you were getting off your soapbox ? There is absolutely no evidence that any of the individuals you mentioned were taking any of the drugs you keep ranting about. If you have such evidence, please provide it, or have the courtesy to stop posting off-topic, ad nauseum.
Monday at 11:20am via mobile · Like
Mark Hansel MC do your homework in stead of lapping up mainstream media propaganda, you have no Clue
Monday at 9:49pm · Edited · Like
Michael Cohn Do you actually have an education or do you just parrot what others write as long as it fits your primitive notions of what might make sense ? When you quote things like "X drug is Y times more likely to be associated with violence than other drugs," WHAT other drugs are you referring to ? Aspirin? Methamphetamine ? You really don't know, because you are either too lazy or too stupid to engage in any critical thinking. You are content to just cut, paste and spam your crap without even reading it...
Yesterday at 6:28am via mobile · Like
Mark Hansel MC, keep wearing your tin foil beanie cap, as it plain to see you want to protect your profession at any cost with it’s dirty little secrets, you want kept hidden. Anyone who gives just a hint of insight into the real world of Psychiatry EXPOSED and it...See More
Michael Moore - Reveals the real cause of Columbine.
Michael Moore obtained a copy of Dr. Tracy's book, "Prozac: Panacea or Pandora? ...
See More
Yesterday at 12:45pm · Edited · Unlike · 1 · Remove Preview
Mark Hansel S.S.R.Lies music video - 2012 edition - exposes the psychiatric drugging of children
This is the new 2012 music video for S.S.R.Lies, a song first written by Michael Adams (Amethios) in 2009.
Adams, was awarded the "Human Rights Award" by CCHR in 2010 for his work exposing the fraud behind psychiatry and the drugging of children. This music video exposes the truth behind psychiatric drugs, and it promotes the information of Peter Breggin (www.Breggin.com) as well as InfoWars, NaturalNews and others. SSRI antidepressant drugs have been implicated in school shootings, murder-suicides, military massacres and other violent acts of death and destruction. Even though the song focuses on antidepressants, many children today are drugged with Ritalin and other "speed" amphetamine drugs which are also mentioned in the song.
Psychiatric Drug Facts with Dr. Peter Breggin - HOME
www.breggin.com
Peter R. Breggin MD, psychiatrist, author and medical expert provides up to dat...
See More
21 hours ago · Like · Remove Preview
S.S.R.Lies music video - 2012 edition - exposes the psychiatric drugging of children
This is the new 2012 music video for S.S.R.Lies, a song first written by Michael Adams (Amethios) in 2009. Adams, the editor of NaturalNews.com, wrote and pe...
21 hours ago · Like · Remove Preview
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death (FULL VERSION)
Full credit for this video goes to CCHR. I have no connection with Scientology, religious or otherwise. I am however a former victim of criminal psychiatric ...
21 hours ago · Like · Remove Preview
Erin Pizzey Mark I understand that you have your point of view but my concern is discussing what happens between members of a family that brings about these tragedies. Whether you believe or don't believe in psychiatry belongs in you own domain not in mine. At the moment we have no idea of what really happened, no facts to go on at all. So apart from feeling the pain for the families who lost their children and and for the families who lost those brave teachers I ask you to restrict yourself to commenting on the facts of this case om my Facebook.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1
Adam Lanza’s father Peter Lanza still can’t understand why his son snapped.
scallywagandvagabond.com
Adam Lanza and the culture of violence. Why it will continue to live on. Adam Lanza’s body remains unclaimed. But why Peter Lanza? In the latest developments of the Sandy Hook Elementary sch...
3 hours ago · Like
Tim Marshall Speculation on the culpability of a mother is certainly very, very dangerous. I imagine such speculation wouldn't be nearly so contentious if he had been living with his father under the same circumstances.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like
Ruth Glover If he was 10 years old I might agree. But he was 20 and quite capable of making his own decisions. He didnt like the fact his father had been having an affaiar and then left the family home to create a new home with his girlfreind. I imagine that kind of scenario screws up motre children than those who are separated and divorced would care to admit
2 hours ago · Like
Warren Gibson Good points,Erin Pizzey,we only know what the Media spits at us,& the fellows on your wall can debate Psyc drugs till the Cows come home,evry case is different/Individual.?
2 hours ago · Like
Tim Marshall So, it was really the father's fault Ruth?
2 hours ago via mobile · Like
Erin Pizzey In a case I know about a young boy of 15 shot is father and then turned his gun on his mother. She was telling me the story about the violence of her husband and she pointed towards the very visible gun shot wound in her neck. She survived but her husband did not. Her main concern was that her son was ordered to be retained in a mental hospital for treatment. She wanted him jailed. I asked her why she wanted him in jail rather than a mental hospital. She said she did not want the stigma of mental illness in her family? How many fingers were on the trigger of that gun? Until we treat the whole family we will never get to the truth. In my case my mother Madrid sure that all her three children hated and disposed our father. It took years for me to see him for what he was. Yes he was terrifying and yes he was a bully but she could of helped this troubled man but she made it her business to keep him miserable and unloved. She spent his money on her designer clothes. She made a fool of him when ever she could. She loved the status he could give her, the big houses and the servants and she made his children into his enemies.. She made it clear that she wanted him dead which of his three children could have their finger prints on the knife or the gun in our family? If you marinate children in violence they will tend to use violence to solve their problems.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like · 2
Ruth Glover no, Adam Lanza was old enough to be responsible for his own actions
2 hours ago · Like
Erin Pizzey Ruth children brought up in violent homes tend to be emotionally retarded. Let's wait until we have confirmation about any facts not speculations. All I can see from what we do know is that he was a confused emotionally isolated young man who surrounded himself with violence be it the games he played or the guns in house only time will answer the questions but nothing will give the relatives whose children and family died any comfort.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1
Ruth Glover yes I agree - wait until we have confirmation about facts, not speculations
2 hours ago · Like
Mark Hansel Erin Pizzey stated: Mark I understand that you have your point of view, but my concern is discussing what happens between members of a family that brings about these tragedies. Whether you believe or don't believe in psychiatry belongs in you own domain not in mine. At the moment we have no idea of what really happened, no facts to go on at all. So apart from feeling the pain for the families who lost their children and and for the families who lost those brave teachers I ask you to restrict yourself to commenting on the facts of this case my Facebook.
.................
So in response to your comments, blaming parents is easy to do, but not blaming society as a whole is outright wrong as to what is being shoved in everyone's faces. Being blind to facts is what most people do. As there are facts that have come to light, but no one is really interested in facts, just emotional responses. Erin, all this stuff is related and intertwined, and just discussing the mother or father of the children is baseless, and a waste of time, while at the same time refusing to discuss what happens to children when government agency's pushing the Marxist destruction of kids is over looked, as you know, what the legal system itself in family court in divorces really does to destroy families and makes winners and losers in the legal system, with corruption, and manipulation, that allows society' to abuse children on all levels, in order to create these monsters and where profit is used by lawyers and government and the medical profession. My friends child took his life, due to the medication he was forced to take, that so called doctors said would help him, because he was depressed and faced issues that effected him later in life because of the courts and their phony laws and the ,medical profession, that didn't want children living in a healthy stable home. A legal system and medical system that creates a war on family’ that harms children after divorce. Which is why I quit the legal profession.
Two media reports suggest that Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza's mother was seeking mental-health treatment for him – perhaps including involuntary commitment. Experts say seeking treatment against someone's will is fraught with difficulties. These reports are bringing to light a debate over where to set the bar when it comes to forcing an individual into treatment – and whether those caring for people with mental-health issues have enough resources available to head off potential crises before they happen. It called Pre-crime Erin, a new area in law being played out where people's rights are violated and forced treatment is used to satisfy control freaks in the medical profession.
Lanza’s crime does indeed represents a failure of our “system” of mental health care in America, as has been said countless times this week. Another good example being played out now, to further kids being used and being screened for mental illness, these medical phony scientists now want the School Shooter's DNA to Be Studied, in order to bring about a “new disease” to profit on and to further removing kids using eugenics' itself or using more harmful drugs to create more death and harm to kids. NOTE ERIN; "Geneticists said they are likely looking at Lanza's DNA to detect a mutation or abnormality that could increase the risk of aggressive or violent behavior. 'By studying genetic abnormalities they want to learn more about conditions better and who is at risk and what might be dramatic treatments,' Arthur Beaudet, a professor at Baylor College of Medicine said, adding if the gene abnormality is defined the 'treatment to stop' other mass shootings or 'decrease the risk is much approved.' What you are going to see Erin, is more mothers being screened, to see if there child or unborn baby it a danger to society as a whole and force abortions or forced drug use on children to further the phony science being pushed.
This video below describes just what these monsters do, in order to create new mental illness and diseases for profit."
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death. Watch it and see what history has shown us all, about these individuals.
Wither you agree or not, Given the fact, that virtually every mass shooter in recent history has been on some form of SSRI drug, expect the corporate press, much of which is funded by Big Pharma advertising, to want to keep the fact quiet. By hiding the clear link to anti-psychotic drugs, the establishment can continue to blame guns and the second amendment for the tragic shooting. However, if and when an SSRI connection is made, the gun control argument will be severely diluted. The medical profession giving kids psychotropic drugs to kids, that causes children to become further ill with phony science, that says it is only trying to help kids and creates more violence in children even further to such a point that the kids go and and kill people.. Then you get the mainstream media hyping up the shootings to take everyone's freedoms away, in order that they destroy the very foundations that freedom and rights where built on called the U.S. Constitution.
Despite the fact that the mainstream media got key facts wrong in early reporting. It was initially reported that Adam Lanza’s mother, the first victim of the rampage, was a teacher at the school, which was not true. It was initially reported that Lanza had also killed his father, which was not true. It was initially reported that the culprit behind the massacre was Ryan Lanza, Adam Lanza’s brother, which was not true. Initial reports that a “second gunman” arrested in the woods behind the school was involved in the massacre were later dropped without explanation. Given that most of the “misinformation” about the shooting came from corporate media sources, the fact that Facebook is punishing users for asking questions about the proper sequence of events – essentially labeling such activity a thought crime – is a worrying development. Responding to comments McBreen another Alternet news person had made about off-grid preppers being treated as criminals, the “Facebook Team” wrote, “Be careful making about making political statements on facebook,” adding, “Facebook is about building relationships not a platform for your political viewpoint. Don’t antagonize your base. Be careful and congnizat (sic) of what you are preaching.”
Prozac and its family of psychotropic drugs are at the heart of 99% off mass murder shootings. The media also hypes victim disarmament zones like public brainwashing centers as a great place for Prozac and Zoloft heads to kill. They always go to the place with no guns so they can take there time. Guns don’t kill people kook psychologist pushing SSRI do.
Even right, now as I speak the very fact that the School Obama's Daughters Attend Has 11 Armed Guards
Psychiatry: An Industry of Death (FULL VERSION)
Full credit for this video goes to CCHR. I have no connection with Scientology, religious or otherwise. I am however a former victim of criminal psychiatric ...
31 minutes ago · Like · Remove Preview