Fathers Canada

…Who enforce nutritional insanity

Mike Adams
Natural News
Wednesday, February 15, 2012

First it was the TSA searching your underpants at the airport, claiming to be protecting you from “terrorists.” Now a local elementary school in North Carolina is searching the homemade lunches of schoolchildren with the goal of forcing children to ditch their nutritious, home-made meals and learn to consume pasteurized, homogenized USDA-approved cow’s milk and chemically-laced processed meats that promote cancer.

This is what happened, as reported in theCarolina Journalyesterday:

“A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because a state employee told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious.”(http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/homemade-lunch-replaced-wit…)

The paper goes on to report:

“The girl’s turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the agent who was inspecting all lunch boxes in her More at Four classroom that day.”

Hold on a sec there, partner. There are AGENTS inspecting lunch boxes of schoolchildren?

You thought the TSA was bad? Get ready for school lunch pat-downs!

That’s the first highly disturbing part of this entire story. See, the corrupt state is trying to take over everything, including the American family. Telling little Johnny that his mom packed an “inferior” lunch is one way of teaching children that they should worship the state instead of their parents. It’s entirely consistent with the actions of pathetic child health sellouts such as California Governor Jerry Brown who recently signed a law giving 12-year-old children the right to “consent” to being injected with Gardasil vaccines as long as they don’t tell their parents. (http://www.naturalnews.com/033831_Jerry_Brown_Gardasil.html)

Parents are useless. The state is God. Write that down, boys and girls, as you’ll be tested on it later. And please don’t tell all the TSA perverts that new jobs are opening up involvingsearching the sacks of elementary schoolchildren, or they’ll quit the TSA in droves and line up to be part of anything that might involve touching little children (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=979D7B9F44BA6EAE0DF65B3DE6E4EE33).

In North Carolina, the homemade school lunches that don’t meet USDA guidelines are then “enhanced” with what the state calls the “missing items” (the processed meat laced with chemicals, or the dead, pasteurized milk, produced with Bovine Growth Hormones). Parents are thenbilled(fined) for the additional cost of these “missing” items.

In other words, the state is forcing parents to buy cancer-causing processed foods and feed them to their children!

“What got me so mad,” said the girl’s mother, as reported in CarolinaJournal.com, “…is, number one, don’t tell my kid I’m not packing her lunch box properly. I pack her lunchbox according to what she eats. It always consists of a fruit. It never consists of a vegetable. She eats vegetables at home because I have to watch her because she doesn’t really care for vegetables.” (http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/homemade-lunch-replaced-wit…)

But the other truly disturbing part about all this is that the “official” USDA-approved nutritional requirements for children are nothing more than a total sellout to the corrupt dairy industry! Here, drink pasteurized, homogenized,hormone-produced milk which will probably make the girls hit puberty at age 9 while causing the little boys to grow armpit hair before they’re old enough to tie their own shoelaces.

Ditch your healthy food and eat this homogenized crap!

So the girl brought to school a turkey and cheese sandwich, a banana, some potato chips and some apple juice. Admittedly, it’s not the lunch of champions or anything, but guess what the school forced her to eat instead? Chicken nuggets.

Yeah, those are the deep-fried “parts is parts” chicken-like objects made from mechanically-separated chicken (yuck). They probably contain MSG or some other taste-enhancing chemical, too, and they’re no doubt fried in genetically-modified soy oil or corn oil. That must be very conducive to a learning environment, huh?

And this elementary school’s current home page features a giant photo of children holding up signs that read, “HELP FIGHT HEART DISEASE.” (http://whes.hcs.k12.nc.us/) Seriously? Do they honestly think feeding chicken nuggets to preschoolers is an intelligent way to fight heart disease? (Dear God, what has public education come to in America?)

Since when was the state any kind of authority on nutrition anyway?

All this takes a lot of gall for a government that routinely formulates the most nutritionally-depletedschool lunch programsandprison food imaginable. If the government was in charge of our nutrition, we’d all be eating genetically modified poison laced with pharmaceuticals and birth control. It’s almost like Bill Gates’ heavenly recipe for “feeding the world,” huh?

Eat this and die. That’s what the government’s pushing these days. After all, the sooner you all die, the more money the government will save on social security, Medicare and other entitlements it can’t afford to pay for much longer. I bet that’s one social science lesson these kids aren’t taught in school.You’re more valuable to the state dead than alive.

The government likes to act like it’s all “official” or something, and that it’s somehow looking out for the welfare of these children. It was theDivision of Child Development and Early Educationat theDepartment of Health and Human Serviceswhich enforced these loony requirements. According to all those “officials” (i.e. government nutritional morons who eat junk food all day while sitting at their desks and injecting themselves with insulin all day), a “healthy” meal for a child should consist of:

• One serving of meat, such as sausages laced with cancer-causing sodium nitrite, which is linked to a 300% increase in brain tumors in children and a 67% increase in pancreatic cancer (http://www.naturalnews.com/007133.html).

• One serving of pasteurized, homogenized, heart-disease inducing cow’s milk which also causes allergies, autoimmune disorders and digestive problems.

• One serving of grain, which could be met by serving some nutritionally-depleted white bread.

• Two servings of fruit or vegetables, including those gross canned peaches floating in corn syrup.

Yep! That’s the USDA’s pathetic definition of nutrition, folks. A bunch of disease-inducing processed dead food that’s sanctioned by the very same state that wants a dead population. So it all makes sense, you see.

God forbid the mom that packs a lunch for her child that looks something like this:

• A fresh sprout salad (state officials have never seen living sprouts and would probably condemn them as being too “alive” to be safely consumed. Irradiate it!).

• A fresh avocado sprinkled with paprika and nutritional yeast (huh? Is that a fruit? A vegetable? What does it count for? This would confuse school officials for weeks who would have to convene a committee to study the issue…)

• An egg sandwich made from free-range chicken eggs, served up on gluten-free whole grain English muffins (what? No meat! You are murdering your child, you careless parents! Call Child Protective Services!)

• A bottle of fresh juice made that morning from oranges, carrots, lemons and a hint of ginger. (LIVING food? That’s the food of terrorists! Nothing alive is allowed in the schools! Forbidden!)

You see, school officials wouldn’t recognize a nutritious lunch of it slapped them across the face. There’s nothing quite like being cold-cocked with an egg-and-tomato sprout sandwich.

Instead, these pathetic state “health department” enforcers apparently ended their own nutritional education with health class in high school, which gives you evenlesseducation than the innate knowledge of a typical mule, because at least the mule knows to eat the living grass and flowers growing right out of the soil. Yep, I said it: These state officials knowless than an assabout nutrition.

Coming next: Government agents inspecting children’s meals IN YOUR HOME

But where is this school lunch inspection behavior really heading? Well, since the state loves your children so much, and since it is now the full responsibility of the state to care for your children, vaccinate them, feed them and program their brains with false U.S. history, the next step is government food agents conducting door-to-door surprise inspections at your house!

There’s a knock on the door. You foolishly answer it, only to find three trendy government agents with fake smiles plastered on their faces, flashing their badges. “We’re from the health department, and we’re here to inspect your refrigerator. You have children here, correct?”

The next thing you know, they discovered a sprouting machine on your countertop and your stash of raw milk hidden away in the back of the fridge. “Looks like we got ourselves a food terrorist here!” one of the agents mutters to the other. “Call in CPS! And the SWAT team!”

A few minutes later, you’re face down in the dirt in your own front yard, where the local city council fined you for trying to grow tomatoes, by the way (http://www.naturalnews.com/032960_Julie_Bass_home_gardening.html). Health department thugs are grinding a knee into your lower back, and one of them leans in to whisper into your ear: “You think those are YOUR children? WE are their parents now, get it? And we control what they eat and what medicine they get from now on.”

One of them cracks the back of your head with the butt of his government-issue rifle, slapping your nose into the soil as a sharp reminder. “And don’t make us come back, or we’ll have to take your little Johnny away and make him disappear into our world, where there are at least a dozen sexually frustrated agents who are looking for fresh meat, so to speak. Because meat is a USDA requirement, get it?”

That’s what could soon be coming your way in America — a nation that’s beginning to resemble North Korea in its total abandonment of human rights and human decency.

When schools denounce the role of parents in feeding their own children — and when doctors denounce the role of parents in making health care decisions for their own children — we aren’t too far away from the total state-run takeover of parenting.

Worship the state; surrender your children to total sterilization

You think it’s a coincidence that the health department wants your children to eat GMO food that’s chemically contaminated with brain-damaging excitotoxins? Of course not: The state wants to, at minimum, make your children sterile. If all the toxic GMOs and food chemicals happen to give them cancer or some other chronic disease in the mean time, that’s just a bonus dividend paid out by the pharmaceutical industry for all its profiteering on human suffering.

And hey, if your kid actually dies from all the poisonous food, the deadly vaccines, or the radiation fallout from all the deteriorating nuclear power plants across the country, that’s just a bonus for Bill Gates who factors it into his depopulation equation: P = P – 1 , where P = Population. Your kid is the “minus one” part of that calculation.

Of course, that’s good for the planet, right? So you should be happy to sacrifice your children to the state, as long as their early death brings down CO2 emissions. Just how much carbon dioxide does a pair of tiny lungs generate with its last dying breath, anyway? It gives a whole new meaning to the “depart” segment of the phrase “Health DEPARTment.”

That’s the point of the Health Department, you see: To make youdepartfrom this world by destroying your health first.

The point is that as long as you follow the USDA, follow the Health Department, and submit to the new “food police” agents conducting random sack searches (and no, I don’t mean the TSA again) then you’ll get along just fine with the status quo. The government worshippers. The trendy statists who think it takes a village of government agents to raise a child.

It’s not enough to raise Amish raw milk farmers at gunpoint, you see, or for the government to destroy $50,000 worth of raw wholesome milk that was about to fed to hungry infants and babies (http://www.naturalnews.com/033220_Rawesome_Foods_armed_raids.html). In order to completely crush all remaining shards of liberty and drive the stake of total tyranny through the American family, the government has topunish nutritional non-conformity. Any parent who attempts to pack a school lunch that does not contain processed cancer-causing meat and pasteurized dead cow’s milk shall be punished, blamed and publicly humiliated.

Down with nutrition! Conformity is safety! Obedience is freedom! Chant that mantra of oppression fifty times until you start believe it, and then stop homeschooling your children and send them off to be de-educated in public schools, where both their minds and their bodies are poisoned on a daily basis so that they can grow up to become reporters for CNN.

Bow down before your new God, the all-powerful, all-seeing, all-spying Government. We are your parents now, little children. Worship us and you will be rewarded with coupons and trinkets. We may even give you an iPhone if you take enough vaccines without telling your parents. Shhhh!

Let your voice be heard

The school that allowed this “food police” activity to take place is the West Hoke Elementary School in Raeford, North Carolina. Its web page is:
http://whes.hcs.k12.nc.us/

The school’s slogan is:West Hoke Elementary School commits to promoting education by providing an environment conducive to learning.

Really? I guess nutrition doesn’t play any role in that learning “environment.” Forcing little children to eat processed chicken nuggets and pasteurized, homogenized, dead cow’s milk that’s filled with pus (yes, that’s true) isn’t much of a commitment to learning, is it now?

The principal of this school is Jackie Samuels. He is not the bad guy here and may not have even been aware this was going on. It was the state officials who conducted this food police activity at the school, not the school administrators.

The phone number of the school is:910-875-2584

If you do contact this school or its principal Jackie Samuels, please be polite. Don’t go all crazy on ‘em. Remember: Teaching is a very tough job, and most teachers are dedicated professionals who genuinely want to help. My beef is with the state officials who conducted these sack lunch searches, not the elementary school staff. Just let principal Samuels know that you don’t approve of them allowing government food police use their school as a “food police checkpoint” that only indoctrinates little children into learning obedience to the growing police state.

After all, elementary school is a place of learning. But WHAT are the kids learning if the school teaches them it’s okay for government agents to deny them their own lunches and force them to eat processed toxic food instead? The message is clear: Your parents are bad! Government is God! Worship the state, or you will be punished.

HEADLINE NEWS LINKS

1. Swine flu clinics for schoolchildren will open in January
2. Fairfax County to Conduct Video Surveillance on High School Lunch Lines
3. Texas Cops Ticket Thousands of Schoolchildren to Raise Revenue, Some as Young as 6-Yrs-Old
4. Photos from Rawesome Foods raid prove government agents illegally stole entire inventory of buyer’s club
5. Chicago school bans some lunches brought from home
6. Government agents stole $9,000 in cash during Rawesome Foods raid, says witness
7. Government to teach parents how to raise children
8. Government Protects “the Children” From Parents and Raw Milk
9. It’s time to grade parents, new bill proposes
10. Big Brother Not Just Spying On Schoolchildren Through Their Laptops
11. 6-year-old suspended for bringing camping utensil to Delaware school
12. Boy Disciplined for Waving “Pizza Gun”

CNN tells masses 'Communism has been good for women'

In an astounding piece the status of women in China, CNN commentators tell viewers that, If the statistics are any indication, Communism has been good for women. This claim is outrageous. Communism itself has done everything to reduce the individual and elevate the State. Have women been liberated or compelled to enter the workplace under a system known for exploitation?


"Chen Zhili president of the all-China women's federation, one of the top ranking women in the Chinese government and is witness to the major changes in women's status since the Communist revolution. Among the first laws passed by Chairman Mao's government were statutes banning foot binding, bride selling, dowries, polygamy and concubines. Women were invited to leave the home and join the labor force. Mao spoke those famous words: women hold up half the sky. If the statistics are any indication, communism has been good for women."
The woman mentioned in the CNN piece is Chen Zhili, president of the All-China Women's Federation, who also holds a high level government position as vice-chair of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. She notes the progress of women's cause in China. http://www.womenofchina.cn/Issues/Politics/213738.jsp

"Chinese women and the women's cause have also gone through 60 years with the nation. One word to describe the changes of women's status in the past 60 years is "world-shaking." The founding of the New China has liberated women from the unprivileged level to the master of their country, of the society, and of themselves. The 30 years' implementation of the Reform and Opening up policy has remarkably pushed forward the process of gender equality. Women's status has been improved and they have been able to better reach their full potential."
"Chairman Mao used to say "women hold up half the sky." It was his expectation, but also a reflection of women's status and function in the past 60 years. Chinese women actively participate in the national construction and become a vital force in promoting economic development, social progress, and family harmony. Women have dedicated their talents and efforts to China's revolution, construction, reform, and other causes. Women, accounting for half of the Chinese population, are a mighty force that uphold half of the sky in economic and social development."

China has been widely criticized for Human Rights abuses, particularly towards the treatment of women and religious minorities. The One-Child Policy has been blamed for making women cheap and unwanted.

The One-Child Policy takes primacy because it puts a negative value on life, and it was imposed in a country ripe for systematic degradation of women under that policy. A RAND Corp. study, entitled "The Origins and Evolution of Family Planning Programs in Developing Countries" [pdf: http://wwwcgi.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1276.pdf] evaluates that the countries with the most centralized, authoritarian governments were "matched up" with the most harsh family planning policies, as they were most likely to adopt policies restricting individual liberties. Though nationally-implemented Family Planning Commission did not officially require a strict one child policies, it was encouraged and phased in. Long before it was officially implemented under Deng in 1980, controlling family "size and spacing" was emphasized under Mao's regime. Despite what was "officially" in place, hindsight shows that the worst abuses in coercive population control in the Third World countries was centralized in authoritarian police states with runaway population growth, with China and India two of the worst cases.

Women in the workforce was partially a plank out of the nationally-coordinated Family Planning Program in China. It was ascertained that, on the one hand, keeping women busy and giving them independent pay and status would lower births, while at the same time, factory supervisors could distribute birth control pills and other contraceptives to the women in an organized and timely manner.

Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
December 26, 2011

A controversial case in China where a couple with eight children was found out exposes that reality that the “strict” one child policy is really a double standard where the rich pay to populate the future, while the eugenics slave state cracks down on the family and restricts the reproductive rights of the masses.

An ‘unnamed couple’ from the southern metropolis of Guangzhou were reported to authorities after taking studio photos with their eight children– all born with within a two-month window last year. The infertile couple paid for in-vitro fertilization treatment that led to triplets, while two surrogate mothers gave birth “illegally” to an additional five children.

Multiple-births are common and can even be encouraged under many artificial conception techniques, though it is considered risky. Liao Xinbo, Guangdong’s deputy health chief, promised an investigation, blasting the couple for abusing the system, reportedly stating: ‘Why did they have to hire so many people to have babies for them? Did they think they had the right to bear children just because they were rich? Secondly, what respect to life did they show? Multiple pregnancies are super risky.’

Zhang Feng, director of the Guangdong Family Planning Commission, has also called for fines in violation of the nation’s policies.

Current Chinese law bars surrogacy. Xinhua reports that the state’s investigation will probe the role of several licensed assisted-reproductive facilities in “buying and selling gametes or embryos, providing surrogacy services, using non-certificated sperm, or checking the gender of fetuses without permission.” The report also states:

Some surrogacy agencies charge one million yuan and have five to seven surrogate mothers become pregnant all at once, simply to ensure one of the babies is a boy. The other fetuses are aborted, the report said.

The case, while perhaps extreme, no doubt sheds light on the hypocrisy that exists under the heavy handed controls in China, and has prompted anger in press coverage of the case. But can a couple really be blamed for trying to conceive? These officials voiced the arrogance of the state, who believes that it, and not the individuals, hold the rights over bearing children, and that its draconian policies are justified, despite have prompting forced abortions, infanticide and the selling of children on the black market- particularly among female children, as males hold a premium in Chinese culture.

Under the one child policy, China has a built in bias where the state assumes the power to regulate births, and through controlling the right to breed, creates a divergent society where some sectors can afford a larger family (traditional to society) but most are coerced into sacrificing for a population control program that has become a Type A model for the kind of family rights conceived under the United Nations and related NGOs like the Rockefeller-founded Population Council.

But even those who can afford the monetary price for additional children sacrifice a great deal under China’s policies. The Irish Times writes:

The penalty for breaking the rules on planned birth is the imposition of a fine and a loss of some benefits such as free education and healthcare, but for many wealthy couples in China this is a price worth paying. Their children are known as “black children” and technically have no legal rights.

Routine bribes for extra children is an underplayed reality, if not a dirty secret in China. While harsher treatment exists at the deference of the state, financial penalties are imposed for many second children; often this extends to under the table payoffs for officials to look the other way. Thus, corruption implicitly follows the de facto two-tier family planning policy under a nation that has shifted into a hybrid of overt communist control measures and burgeoning crony capitalism.

While preventing a population bomb might seem desirable, the power of enforcement demanded under state-run eugenics measures are indicative of tyranny. Further, the attempts to improve society with an iron fist have led to an aging population in a society where children traditionally work to support their elders. With fewer heirs, this puts greater financial pressure on a family’s ability to survive.

Of course, the classic Eugenics movement popularized in the early 20th Century had always placed value on the “positive” eugenics of higher birth rates for preferred members of society, while emphasizing downsizing numbers under “negative” eugenics in ‘targeted’ populations of unfavored minorities, and those in the lower economic strata long reviled for their ‘burden to society.’

Frank Notestein, who has served as president of the Population Council, and been a member of numerous key groups including the American Eugenics Society, the Council on Foreign Relations, the International Statistical Institute, the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, and the Population Association of America, wrote in a 1969 paper:

“Given existing preferences in family size, governments must go beyond voluntary family planning. To achieve zero rate of population growth governments will have to do more than cajole; they will have to coerce.”

“…to impose more drastic changes on a large scale implies many risks, not least to the regime that undertakes them. The price for this type of population control may well be the institution of a totalitarian regime.”

 

 

China’s own coercive population measures began ten years later in 1979.

It evolved out of family planning policies (implemented in countless countries across the globe) that first encouraged, then required smaller families, later marriages, literal community patrolling of women’s menstrual cycles and other strategies aimed at reducing population. See the video below, which includes segments from a pre-1979 documentary focusing on a two-child policy in China, as well as propaganda and enforcement efforts to sell the population on the mandate:

CNN tells masses ‘Communism has been good for women’

Researchers, including this author, have long warned of trends for the available technology of the State and that of reproductive health to place a premium on life, where an authoritarian regime grants license for birth, the rich can afford to have more children and the default is towards restricting reproduction.

The 1977 book Ecoscience, written by population bomb scare-monger Paul Ehrlich and now-White House science advisor John P. Holdren, goes a long way in highlighting the global population control system that many globalists and eugenicists hope to bring into reality. There is no question that China serves as forebearer of this “Planetary Regime”:

The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits. [p. 942-3]

The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? [p. 838]

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. [p. 786-7]

Ecoscience and endless other publications and official statements make clear that the elite are assessing the feasibility of coercive/involuntary population control, with an eye towards implementation, starting with cooperative authoritarian regimes like China. Norplant technology has made implantable, but removable, fertility control a reality. The Rockefeller Foundation has also funded the development of anti-fertility vaccines for both males and females.

1. Now Biden finds China one-child policy ‘repugnant’
2. China detained ‘one-month-old’ girl– Before Obama toasted Chinese leader for China’s ‘desire to give our children a better life’
3. Obama Administration Resumes Funding of China’s Eugenics Programs
4. Obama Administration Financially Supports China’s Population Policies Through UN Population Fund
5. How China’s New Generation Of Workers Won’t Accept Slave Labor
6. 1973 Document Outlines Blueprint for ‘Family Planning’ Propaganda
7. China says population control key to Copenhagen deal
8. Divorce Judge Threatens To Take Children From Family
9. Twilight Film Inducing Seizures? China’s Slave Labor, TEPCO & More: Infowars Nightly News
10. US judge grants German homeschooling family asylum
11. Osama bin Laden’s family missing since 9/11 attacks found living in secret compound in Iran
12. The Price of Revolution in China (Satire)