Paul Fassa
Natural Society
April 22, 2013

 

Have you ever seen those long smoke-lines in the sky and wondered what they are? Some may be jet vapor contrails, but others are known as chemtrails. Most of the population doesn’t know, but these trails, loaded with heavy metals that have been measured in the water and air at several different worldwide locations, are actually a threat to your health.

 

Contrails are the result of jet engine vapors condensing into tiny ice particles at high altitude. They are usually not very dense and evaporate quickly. They never extend from one side of the sky to the other, not even close! These trails are dense and linger, often from horizon to horizon, sometimes widening to form streaky clouds.

As more have reported the chemtrail phenomena to government agencies, the usual cover story is that they’re being sprayed as part of a geoengineering effort to slow down global warming, or they’re conducting military drills with releasing streams of metallic particulates to confuse radar.

They are cover stories. So what are they covering? Mainstream media thoroughly ignores or debunks it. Congressman Dennis Kucinich seemed to have caught wind of the hazards of geoengineering for weather control.

He tried to into introduce a bill called the Space Preservation Act in 1997 and 2001, mostly intended to stop Star War projects. Within it the word chemtrails appeared as an item to be banned. The bill went nowhere. Most congressmen are ignorant of the issue or afraid to ask, just like the media.

The denial of something so apparent is outrageous. After looking into chemtrails for yourself, ask anyone to look up if you see them and watch them go into denial as well. Sometimes both contrails and chemtrails appear simultaneously, making it easier to differentiate.

So now that we know they exist, it’s important to recognize the dangers of chemtrails.

Consider the Hazards from Chemtrails
Readings taken after chemtrail episodes from air traps, water traps, ground and snow samples vary slightly from location to location, but they usually contain small particulates or nanoparticles of aluminum, barium, strontium, and sometimes ethylene dibromide or EDB, often called dibromoethane, an EPA banned fuel additive.

Consider that these particulates fan out at high altitudes and fall onto the ground invisibly, affecting foliage, forests, crops, rivers and lakes, animals, and humans. Many aware conservationists and environmentalists are aware of the chemtrail damage to our biosphere.

Breathing nanoparticles of toxic metals into the lungs bypasses our primary immune system’s defenses. These substances make their way into the blood directly from the lung’s capillaries. And aluminum gets through the blood-brain barrier. But don’t worry; Monsanto has patented aluminum resistant seeds. How did they know that was needed? Strange.

Just a couple of years ago, an Arizona resident collected certified medical blood test documents from seriously ill Arizonians and sent them to various State and Federal elected officials demanding an investigation. The blood sample documents showed extremely high amounts of either barium or aluminum or both. None of those people worked or had worked with hazardous materials containing those items. Some were retired.

In the past couple of decades, death from respiratory disease in the US have been increasing. Asthma rates have more than doubled in the western world and Alzheimer’s’ disease and autism spectrum disorders have risen dramatically.

Barium can be linked to multiple diseases including respiratory diseases and aluminum to neurological afflictions.

Even if you’re not directly affected by these nanoparticles from chemtrails, your immune system is adversely affected and forced to work overtime with yet more environmental and food pollutants and toxins, leaving you more prone to infectious and autoimmune diseases. And in any case, if the soil is affected (which it is) you are affected.

There are many groups and individuals doing what they can to bring awareness to government agencies. But this operation’s lid is sealed.

If you’re new to this and curious, start checking out those jet trails and notice the difference between contrails and chemtrails. You can Google chemtrails, aerosol spraying, or geoengineering for more resources and sites with photos and videos. Try to sidestep the usual debunking shills and trolls, but without disregarding all the information. It’s important to look at everything from multiple angles to get a better understanding.

Protecting Yourself
Despite all the efforts of individuals and small groups as well as documentaries, nothing gets done about this toxic elephant in the sky. So you have to protect yourself by detoxing often.

A mineral water product called Volvic, available at Whole Foods and online, has been used to remove aluminum from the brain. The recommended regimen is 1.5 liters daily for five days. And there are other ways to remove heavy metals from the body, including professional chelation and do-it-yourself solutions.

Consider consuming these 6 foods for heavy metal chelation or utilizing these 7 tips for detoxing and cleansing the body. Food grade activated charcoal is yet another detox agent that can be used.

RELATED: Global Chemtrail Bombardment – User Photos and Video – http://www.infowars.com/global-chemtrail-bombardment-user-photos-and-video/

 

Published on Apr 9, 2013 

Derrick Broze
Intelihub
April 3, 2013

They say a global authority is needed to protect the international community from unintended consequences.

According to the Guardian:

“Met Office researchers have called for global oversight of the radical schemes after studies showed they could have huge and unintended impacts on some of the world’s most vulnerable people.”

The dangers arose in projects that cooled the planet unevenly. In some cases these caused devastating droughts across Africa; in others they increased rainfall in the region but left huge areas of Brazil parched.

“The massive complexities associated with geoengineering, and the potential for winners and losers, means that some form of global governance is essential,” said Jim Haywood.”

This is not the first time scientists have spoken out about the dangers of Geo-engineering. Recently Harvard University climate scientist David Keith and UCLA environmental law expert Edward Parson wrote in the journal Nature about the need for guidelines to guide research on the controversial technology. Keith has spoken on the benefits of geo-engineering in the past but now appears to be warning of the dangers.

Keith and Parson believe that governments should begin “informal” planning to oversee small-scale field experiments that they say could help scientists understand how the atmosphere would respond to geoengineering. They are also calling for a moratorium on large scale experiments.

One of the many dangers of manipulating the weather are the loss of blue skies. According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere would scatter sunlight into the atmosphere. He says this could decrease the amount of sunlight that hits the ground by 20% and make the sky appear more hazy.

Geo-engineering is the science of manipulating the climate for the state purpose of fighting mad made climate change.

According to a recent congressional report:

“The term “geoengineering” describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects. “

Despite the claims that these programs are still in their research stage there is much information that points to some type of aerosol spraying, weather modification programs being active. Many supporters of the Chem-Trail theory believe the spraying they see taking place in our skies are geo-engineering programs being run either by private corporations or secretive government agencies with complete disregard for the consequences.

It is no secret that governments have ran programs covertly in the past and apologized later. The United States military has in fact written about using weather modification. In a 1996 document entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025”, the U.S. Air Force discusses a number of proposals for using the weather as a weapon. The document warrants your attention and research.

We also have companies like Weather Modification, Inc. on this corporations site you can peruse different planes that you can pay to run a cloud seeding operation. They even offer a list of clients and places they are active.

There is also the Environmental Modification Treaty signed by the United States to halt global weather modification.

Even the NY Times ponders aloud what would happen if the technology was in the wrong hands:

“A drought in India will come to be seen — accurately or not — as a result of a conscious decision by engineers on the other side of the planet. What was once bad luck could come to be seen as a malevolent plot or an imperialist attack. “

While the mainstream media is finally openly talking about weather modification programs they do so with the premise that the programs are not already taking place. Many of the proposals put forth resemble what millions see everyday: planes spraying particulates in the skies.

With billionaires like Bill Gates funneling millions into these technologies it’s not likely they will be going away any time soon. In fact it seems that the solution that most the mainstream is pushing is to allow a global body, such as the United Nations to begin regulating who which countries or individuals can alter our weather for what purposes. Another push for a global state veiled as an attempt to save the world.

I see this is another example of man corrupting nature. The ruling class has altered the water, they are engineering the food and now working to spray the skies. If concerned citizens everywhere do not organize and spread the message about the dangers and reality of rogue geo-engineering we are likely to see disastrous effects on our planet and our species. For the sake of us all, look up and ask questions.

sources:

^http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/17/geoengineering-research-climate-change-rules_n_2896566.html

^http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/mar/31/earth-cooling-schemes-global-signoff

^http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21873-geoengineering-would-turn-blue-skies-whiter.html

^http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/opinion/sunday/geoengineering-testing-the-waters.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

^http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41371.pdf

^http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

 

Skull - Cry Die



 

Terms now engrained in popular culture

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Sept 26, 2012

While perusing magazines at the local supermarket I stumbled upon this telling display.

It would be a stretch to suggest that there is a vast conspiracy involving the editors of Top Gear Magazine to sell geoengineering as part of a New World Order by demanding their magazine be placed next to the New Scientist! However, this goes to show that these terms have become perniciously engrained in popular culture.

The New Scientist article can be read online for registered users here http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528831.700-can-geoengineering-avert-climate-chaos.html?full=true

It once again goes to great lengths to sell wild ideas of blocking out sunlight in order to battle man made global warming.

As ever, the solutions listed include mass spraying the atmosphere with sulpher particles. The article even admits “we are doing this already”.

Here are a few excerpts:

OOPS. We really didn’t mean to, but we seem to have broken the planet. Is there anything we can do to make it better?

Climate change is already upon us, melting ice, killing forests and making floods and heatwaves more intense. Meanwhile, global emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases continue to increase, promising far worse to come.

Even if we stopped all emissions tomorrow, temperatures would keep rising for decades, with potentially catastrophic consequences ranging from famines to rapid sea-level rise.

So perhaps it is time to get serious about the audacious idea of geoengineering. The hope is that by deliberately tinkering with our planet’s climate machine, we might be able to fix our gargantuan blunder, or at least avoid some of the most serious consequences, or just buy ourselves a bit more time to cut emissions.

[...]

One idea is to whiten marine clouds – specifically the low, flat stratus clouds that cover a large swathe of sky. Ships scattered across the world’s oceans would send plumes of fine salt spray up into the air. By acting as nucleation sites, the salt particles should encourage droplets of water to form in clouds. With more droplets per cubic metre, these clouds would be whiter than normal, and reflect more sunlight. Potentially, this could offset the entire warming from a doubling in CO₂.

Cloud-whitening has its upsides, such as not involving any hazardous chemicals. But cloud nucleation is not well understood, so it might not work as well as its proponents suggest, and cooling only the oceans could disrupt local climate. A study published this year found that seeding clouds over the Pacific might alter rainfall patterns in a similar way to the highly disruptive La Niña weather phenomenon, for instance.

The other leading contender is an old one: fill the atmosphere with a haze of fine particles. In fact, we are doing this already. Sulphur dioxide pollution forms fine droplets of sulphuric acid that already reflect an estimated 0.4 watts per square metre. But SO₂ from fires and factories doesn’t remain in the atmosphere for long, so its effects are limited. If sulphate gets as high as the stratosphere, however, it can linger for years, so its cooling effect is much greater. The proof comes from volcanic eruptions large enough to inject SO₂into the stratosphere. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines cooled the planet by up to 0.5 °C over the following couple of years.

[...]

It is not clear whether a different kind of reflector, such as solid metallic particles or tiny, shiny balloons, would be any better. Pumping out a gas is so much simpler and cheaper, so most studies have concentrated on sulphates.

One need only look up at the sky to confirm that our governments, at the behest of think tanks, ‘research’ groups, and radical environmental organisations, are already engaging in these type of programs. Our skies are riddled with artificial clouds, that are patently not merely the contrails of standard air planes.

Indeed, as we reported two months ago, an experiment funded by Microsoft founder Bill Gates will see thousands of tonnes of sulphur particles sprayed over New Mexico as part of a geoengineering study, despite the fact that even staunch environmentalists have warned the process could have catastrophic effects on the earth’s eco-system.

This is just one example of a practice that has now been in operation for years, if not decades.

Groups such as the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meet routinely to discuss ongoing geoengineering programs, specifically the spraying of aerosols into the atmosphere.

Levels of aluminium, barium and strontium in our air, water and soil have exponentially increased, leading many to conclude that these are the after effects of radical geoengineering programs that are already in operation.

Learn more on this important topic by watching the new geoengineering documentary Why In the World Are They Spraying.

1. CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
2. Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
3. Geoengineering clouds to slow global warming
4. Shading Earth: Delivering Solar Geoengineering Materials to Combat Global Warming May Be Feasible and Affordable
5. Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering
6. Geoengineering: Our Environment Under Attack
7. Geoengineering Unmonitored
8. Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun
9. Geoengineered Food? Climate Fix Could Boost Crop Yields, But With Risks
10. Geo-engineering: The Backstep BS Disinfo Dance
11. Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
12. CBC documentary tackles geo-engineering and ‘past aerosol experiments’

 

Infowars.com
Sept 6, 2012

The cost of a massive program to spray sun-dimming particles into the upper atmosphere in the name of halting global warming, a process some contend is already underway via chemtrails, has been put at just below $5 billion dollars a year.

1. Cost of Chemtrail Program Put At $5 Billion a Year
2. Illegal Immigrants cost feds more than $10 billion a year
3. Why Do Chemtrails Not Exist? Because They Exist
4. IRS, CPA bureaucracy cost tax payers $431 billion a year
5. Bill Gates exposed for funding research, promotion of spraying geo-engineered ‘chemtrails’ across globe
6. The new era of green taxes: Climate change targets to cost every household £500 a year
7. Obama ‘stimulus plan’ to cost ‘between $675 and $775 billion’
8. Debt Jumped $54.1 Billion in 8 Days Preceding Obama-Boehner Deal to Cut $38.5 Billion for Rest of Year
9. IMF: Mortgage Crisis May Cost $945 Billion
10. Naked Body Porno Scanners to Cost $1.2 Billion by 2014
11. Memorial Day BBQ will cost you 29% more this year thanks to inflation
12. US spends $75 billion a year on intelligence

 

New study looks at specially adapted aircraft to disperse particles into upper atmosphere

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Wednesday, September 5, 2012

The cost of a massive program to spray sun-dimming particles into the upper atmosphere in the name of halting global warming, a process some contend is already underway via chemtrails, has been put at just below $5 billion dollars a year.

U.S. scientists writing in the journal Environmental Research Letters concluded that “Planes or airships could carry sun-dimming materials high into the atmosphere for an affordable price tag of below $5 billion a year as a way to slow climate change,” reports Reuters, a process characterized as “both feasible and affordable.”

The cost of using specially adapted aircraft able to operate at high altitudes as a delivery system to disperse sulphur particles was put at $1 to $2 billion a year. Using “giant guns or rockets” would be more expensive.

Co-author Professor Jay Apt of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh told Reuters that injecting the atmosphere with sulphur but then suddenly removing it from the eco-system could cause temperatures to jump, indicating that the program would have to be ongoing in perpetuity.

The study completely failed to analyze whether such a massive geoengineering program would be a good idea and what environmental consequences it would have.

The latest study follows a similar Carnegie Institution for Science proposal which also advocated spraying the upper atmosphere with aerosols, a process that would “reduce by 20 per cent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground” and make blue skies “fade to hazy white,” the New Scientist reported.

Given the fact that most advancements in science and technology are already taking place years before they are disclosed to the public, it stands to reason that geoengineering programs based around spraying the upper atmosphere with particles are already underway, most notably in the form of chemtrails, contrails that linger in the sky for hours and form into artificial clouds.

Scientists now admit that vapor trails from airplanes are creating “artificial clouds” that block out the sun. This is no longer a matter of debate. The chemtrail “conspiracy theorists,” who were ridiculed for pointing out that from the mid-90′s onwards contrails from jet planes were lingering for hours and forming artificial clouds, have been proven correct.

Reading University’s Professor Keith Shine told the Daily Mail that the clouds “formed by aircraft fumes could linger ‘for hours’, depriving those areas under busy flight paths, such as London and the Home Counties, of summer sunshine.”

The report also makes reference to a 2009 Met Office study which found that high-level winds did not disperse contrails that later formed into clouds which covered an astonishing 20,000 miles.

As we have documented, geoengineering programs based around the premise of artificial aerosols were already in operation years ago, including at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, which in 2009 began conducting studies which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere.

Another program under the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program is directed towards, “developing comprehensive understanding of the atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and fate of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter.”

The DOE website states that, “The current focus of the program is aerosol radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol properties that affect direct and indirect influences on climate and climate change.”

These programs are already having the effect of blocking out sunlight. The emergence of the chemtrails phenomenon coincided with an average 22% drop in sunlight reaching the earth’s surface.

In 2008, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.

The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.” The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very unusual,” but commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter” in its discussion with KSLA.

KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system.

Spraying sulphur into the upper atmosphere is linked with both environmental catastrophes and human health problems.

The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.

- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism

Even pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits that injecting sulphur into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain, ozone depletion or weather pattern disruption.”

Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock also, “created computer simulations indicating that sulfate clouds could potentially weaken the Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain that irrigates the food crops of billions of people.”

“Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the planet,” Robock told a geoengineering conference in 2010.

The Canada-based Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC) has called for such experiments to be shut down. “This experiment is only phase one of a much bigger plan that could have devastating consequences, including large changes in weather patterns such as deadly droughts,” the group said in a written statement.

Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of tinkering with the planet’s delicate eco-system could have far-reaching dangers.

“If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid,” said Singer.

Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist – a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation – Doug Parr – has slammed attempts to geoengineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.

1. Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
2. Rosalind Peterson: The Chemtrail Cover-Up
3. Carnegie Institute Calls For Spraying Aerosols To Block The Sun
4. Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering
5. Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
6. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment
7. Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus
8. Scientists Admit Chemtrails Are Creating Artificial Clouds
9. U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere
10. Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun
11. Government Scientists Propose “Geo-Engineering” Earth’s Upper Atmosphere
12. Illegal Immigrants cost feds more than $10 billion a year

 

Infowars.com
September 1, 2012

Filmmaker Michael J. Murphy breaks down the second installment in his series of films exploring the hidden agendas behind geo-engineering– where profits and control are threatening our food supply, environment and independence.

WHY in the World are They Spraying? is an investigative documentary into one of the many hidden agendas associated with chemtrail/geo-engineering programs. Various groups are quietly pursuing these programs, but why and for whose gain?

1. “Why in the World are They Spraying?” Full Length Documentary HD
2. “What in the World are They Spraying?” – Official Trailer
3. What In The World Are They Spraying?
4. What In The World Are They Spraying?
5. Bill Gates exposed for funding research, promotion of spraying geo-engineered ‘chemtrails’ across globe
6. Chemtrails: What In The World Are They Spraying?
7. Shhh!!!, What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum?
8. Dallas Approves Aerial Spraying to Fight West Nile
9. Texas officials defend West Nile-spraying
10. Post-9/11: A hidden world, growing beyond control
11. Image Shows Military Spraying Over Florida City
12. Maui residents craft legislation to ban geo-engineering ‘chemtrails’

 

Prisonplanet.com
Aug 28, 2012

Alex speaks with Michael J. Murphy, a journalist, political activist and co-producer of Why in the World are They Spraying?, an investigative documentary into one of the many hidden agendas associated with chemtrail/geo-engineering programs.

 

Infowars.com
August 19, 2012

WHY in the World are They Spraying? is an investigative documentary into one of the many hidden agendas associated with chemtrail/geo-engineering programs. Various groups are quietly pursuing these programs, but why and for whose gain?

This film is the follow-up to the groundbreaking documentary “What in the World are They Spraying?” which woke up millions to the damaging effects of chemtrails and other geo-engineering programs. As a result, movements around the world are being formed to address these crimes and many concerned citizens are taking action. As people become aware of “what” is happening, they are now asking the even more important question of “why” it’s happening. Michael J. Murphy, originator and Co-Producer of “What in the World are They Spraying?,” in association with Barry Kolsky, have produced “WHY in the World are They Spraying?” to answer that question.

Get ready to uncover:

• The environmental and human health implications of geo-engineering programs.
• How geo-engineering can be used to control our weather.
• What industries benefit from geo-engineering programs.
• How the spraying affects you, your family and the future of humanity.

In this documentary you will learn how the aerosols being sprayed into our sky are used in conjunction with other technologies to control our weather. Geo-engineers maintain that their models are only for the mitigation of the now widely debunked theory of global warming. What is clear is that the chemtrail/geo-engineering can be used as a way to consolidate an enormous amount of both monetary and political power into the hands of the technocratic elites. Certain international corporations can now leverage weather control to gain power over the Earth’s natural systems. This of course, is being done at the expense of every living thing on the planet. WHY in the World are They Spraying? is a must see film and will revolutionize the environmental movement.

1. What In The World Are They Spraying?
2. What In The World Are They Spraying?
3. AE911Truth Experts Speak Out: Full Length Documentary
4. “What in the World are They Spraying?” – Official Trailer
5. Shhh!!!, What If It Was Reported That They Are Spraying Aluminum?
6. Bill Gates exposed for funding research, promotion of spraying geo-engineered ‘chemtrails’ across globe
7. New World Order Documentary Asserts Global Conspiracy
8. CBC documentary tackles geo-engineering and ‘past aerosol experiments’
9. Chemtrails: What In The World Are They Spraying?
10. 9/11 Truth: Hollywood Speaks Out (FULL LENGTH FILM)
11. Endgame: The HQ Full Length Version Now Online
12. Marking One Year In Office: The Obama Deception HQ Full length version

 

The Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Coverup Revealed. read more ...

Geoengineering threatens to worsen droughts, starve millions

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, July 17, 2012

An experiment funded by Microsoft founder Bill Gates will see thousands of tonnes of sulphur particles sprayed over New Mexico as part of a geoengineering study, despite the fact that even staunch environmentalists have warned the process could have catastrophic effects on the earth’s eco-system.

“David Keith, one of the investigators, has argued that solar geoengineering could be an inexpensive method to slow down global warming, but other scientists warn that it could have unpredictable, disastrous consequences for the Earth’s weather systems and food supplies,” reports the Guardian.

“His US experiment, conducted with American James Anderson, will take place within a year and involve the release of tens or hundreds of kilograms of particles to measure the impacts on ozone chemistry, and to test ways to make sulphate aerosols the appropriate size. Since it is impossible to simulate the complexity of the stratosphere in a laboratory, Keith says the experiment will provide an opportunity to improve models of how the ozone layer could be altered by much larger-scale sulphate spraying.”

The Harvard University project, in which sun-reflecting particles will be sprayed from a balloon at an altitude of 80,000 feet above Fort Sumner, New Mexico, is being funded by Bill Gates, who earlier this year threw his financial muscle behind manipulating the earth’s climate via geoengineering.

The risks involved in spraying the upper atmosphere with sulphur particles are so brazen that even environmentalists who support the man-made global warming mantra have sternly warned against it, such as Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist Doug Parr, who slammed attempts to geoengineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.

Indeed, the consequences could be devastating for poor people in the third world. Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock has, “created computer simulations indicating that sulfate clouds could potentially weaken the Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain that irrigates the food crops of billions of people.”

“Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the planet,” Robock told a geoengineering conference in 2010.

Stephen Schneider of Stanford University, who proposed a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the upper atmosphere that would be used to block out the Sun, admits that geoengineering could cause “conflicts between nations if geoengineering projects go wrong.”

“Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions – potentially threatening the food supplies of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, executive director of the Canadian-based technology watchdog ETC Group. “It will do nothing to decrease levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean acidification. And solar geoengineering is likely to increase the risk of climate-related international conflict – given that the modelling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global south.”

Aside from the unknown dangers, what is known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA“Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation’s cultural heritage.”

The health effects of bombarding the skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to raise serious questions about whether such programs should even be allowed to proceed.

The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.

- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism

According to the LennTech website, “Laboratory tests with test animals have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause foetal damage and congenital effects. Mothers can even carry sulfur poisoning over to their children through mother milk. Finally, sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.”

Even pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits that injecting sulphur into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain, ozone depletion or weather pattern disruption.”

Given the fact that Bill Gates is a member of a secret billionaire’s club that meets to discuss the threat caused by overpopulation, many find it insidious that he is simultaneously funding projects which threaten to depopulate poor areas of the world by causing droughts which could potentially kill millions through starvation.

1. CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
2. Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering
3. U.S. Government Mad Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere
4. Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
5. Chemist Proposes Polluting Atmosphere to Fight “Global Warming”
6. Bill Gates exposed for funding research, promotion of spraying geo-engineered ‘chemtrails’ across globe
7. Government Scientists Propose “Geo-Engineering” Earth’s Upper Atmosphere
8. Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
9. Radioactive particles from Japan detected in California kelp
10. Solution For Global Warming: Poison The Air, Cut Down Trees
11. Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
12. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment

 

Infowars.com
Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Paul Joseph Watson discusses the latest developments with the geo-engineering agenda.

1. Media Portrays Suspected Holocaust Museum Shooter as “Antigovernment Extremist”
2. American Militia, Media Spin
3. Corporate Media Portrays Loughner as Gold and Silver Advocate
4. 1917: J.P. Morgan bought US corporate media to be 1%’s lying sacks of spin?
5. Media Continues Skin Cancer Scare by Vilifying Natural Sunlight, Vitamin D
6. Alex Jones: Corporate Media Puts Spin on WikiLeaks
7. Harvard Study Finds Bisphenol A In Dental Fillings And Sealants, Media Spin Begins
8. Bill Gates exposed for funding research, promotion of spraying geo-engineered ‘chemtrails’ across globe
9. Maui residents craft legislation to ban geo-engineering ‘chemtrails’
10. Maui residents craft legislation to ban geo-engineering ‘chemtrails’
11. October Surprise: Muslim Brotherhood, Syria & Turkey News Heats Up
12. Sheeple Looking Forward to Troops on The Streets

 

Daily Mail Reporter
June 20, 2012

Like a giant game of crosses without the naughts, these incredible jet engine trails can be seen criss-crossing the Atlantic from space.

NASA’s Terra satellite captured these two amazing images of aircraft trails, or ‘contrails’ as they are known, spreading across the sky off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada.

The spectacular effect forms in the wake of passing aircraft due to the extra particles and water vapor contained in their exhaust.

Read full article

1. Attack of the vapours – how jet trails block out the sunshine
2. European Parliament Questioned on Chemtrails
3. Advancing the Transatlantic Agenda
4. Geoengineering Unmonitored
5. Newfoundland police need no reason to stop drivers
6. China space station signals shift in space race
7. The Militarization of Outer Space: The Pentagon’s “Space Warriors”
8. Visible Proof That Oswald Was Innocent
9. Vintage film shows chemtrail in 1938 Nazi Germany
10. Aspartame Study: 67% of Female Rats Developed Visible Tumors
11. Biden: Stay Off Subways During Swine Flu Panic
12. Report: Iran tells departed US carrier to ‘stay out’ of Persian Gulf’

 

Susanne Posel
Prisonplanet.com
June 19, 2012

Use of geoengineering is supported by members of the scientific community working in line with the climate change alarmists. These modifications extend to plate tectonics, ocean fertilization, cloud seeding, Co2 sequestration and military weaponry.

Project Cirrus (PC), a.k.a. Project Stormfury), was conducted by the US government between 1962 and 1983 in an attempt to manipulate the weather by affecting hurricane behavior.

PC was headed by General Electric, the US Army Signal Corps, the Office of Naval Research and the US Air Force .

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) states in their study that “climate engineering technologies, focusing on their technical status, future directions for research and potential responses.” The GAO reviewed the scientific literature and government reports, consulted experts with a wide variety of backgrounds and viewpoints, and surveyed 1,006 adults across the United States.

The GAO concluded that “climate engineering technologies do not now offer a viable response to global climate change.”

Areas of study were:

 

Zen Gardner
June 5, 2012

Here they go again. It’s amazing what they think they can get away with.

The frequency of this inane toying with the mass psyche regarding chemtrails, in particular, does seem to be picking up. This gradual introduction of this geoengineering debacle from Bill Gates’ admissions to these periodic smatterings of scientific “ideas” is like watching a movie backwards.

Now apply that principle to everything else the Controllers ever “forecast” or propose as a possible solution to mankind’s problems. Besides global warming, we’re apparently also overpopulated. Think there might be programs now in place taking care of that already as well, while they discuss what should be done about it? Or have something in mind for the food shortages they warn of that they themselves have engineered (think genetically altering GMOs)? Or might they have controls, surveillance or militant, fascist solutions in place for the coming manipulated riots against corrupt government, monetary subterfuge and loss of land and liberty?

You bet your booties there are.

Think sci-fi and futuristic books and movies as well. Then hit rewind to today. In some way they’re already doing it.

We’re there in many ways, and approaching a fulfillment of their predictive programmed false reality rapidly. The framework is being built around us like a packing crate while they tell us they might need to do something in the future.

Here’s a recent example of what I’m talking about…

An Even WHITER Shade of Pale?

Geoengineering for Global Warming: Increasing Aerosols in Atmosphere Would Make Sky Whiter

(ScienceDaily) One idea for fighting global warming is to increase the amount of aerosols in the atmosphere, scattering incoming solar energy away from Earth’s surface. But scientists theorize that this solar geoengineering could have a side effect of whitening the sky during the day. New research from Carnegie’s Ben Kravitz and Ken Caldeira indicates that blocking 2% of the sun’s light would make the sky three-to-five times brighter, as well as whiter.

Oh really, boys? You’re a scientist and never look up? No. You’re lying stooges treating us like imbeciles.

Notice they say the idea is “to increase the amount of aerosols” in the atmosphere. A little playing with the mind there using an assumptive inference like the chemtrail aerosols are already there and just need to be increased?

The insanity continues:

Their work is published June 1st in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

Carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of coal, oil, and gas have been increasing over the past decades, causing Earth to get hotter and hotter. Large volcanic eruptions cool the planet by creating lots of small particles in the stratosphere, but the particles fall out within a couple of years, and the planet heats back up. The idea behind solar geoengineering is to constantly replenish a layer of small particles in the stratosphere, mimicking this volcanic aftermath and scattering sunlight back to space.

The idea is to constantly replenish the crap in the air and thus mimick a volcanic aftermath? Are you crazy? It’s been proven earth’s environment gets thoroughly disrupted when that happens, including human and animal health issues, crop failures, and extreme climate changes. This is complete idiocy!

Using advanced models, Kravitz and Caldeira — along with Douglas MacMartin from the California Institute of Technology — examined changes to sky color and brightness from using sulfate-based aerosols in this way. They found that, depending on the size of the particles, the sky would whiten during the day and sunsets would have afterglows.

Right. “The sky would whiten.” Like now, you bastards?

Their models predict that the sky would still be blue, but it would be a lighter shade than what most people are used to looking at now. The research team’s work shows that skies everywhere could look like those over urban areas in a world with this type of geoengineering taking place. In urban areas, the sky often looks hazy and white. Source

So let’s have hazy polluted skies everywhere to keep us safe from global warming? Bullshit.

Chemtrails CAUSE Global Warming!

As usual, they flip everything backwards just to keep us in the state of cognitive dissonance. (see HERE)

This is well summarized here:

One point government officials fail to mention is that using weather modification is the cause of the changes we see in the planet’s natural bio-spherical patterns. Chemtrails, and the toxins they release into the atmosphere, have an effect of warming temperatures.

The aluminum in the chemtrails, which is claimed to reflect the sun’s heat out into space, also traps the heat from the Earth’s surface causing a stagnant layer of extremely hot air.

What scientists call the “greenhouse effect” is actually a direct causation of this geo-engineering process.

The climate change alarmists and their gang of quack scientists depend solely on computer models to explain their assertions.

When the researchers claimed that pollution was trapping heat within the clouds, did it occur to them that geo-engineering is dumping massive amounts of aluminum and other toxins into the clouds; toxins that would obviously be considered pollution?

Quite ironic, seeing that their own geo-engineering is causing the effects they claim are caused by man-made global warming. (Emphasis mine) Source

Read full article here

1. CBC documentary tackles geo-engineering and ‘past aerosol experiments’
2. CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
3. Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
4. TIME Article Pushes Geo-engineering Agenda
5. Government Scientists Propose “Geo-Engineering” Earth’s Upper Atmosphere
6. The Government Is Already “Geo-Engineering” The Environment
7. Geo-Engineering: Killing Off The Useless Eaters
8. Maui residents craft legislation to ban geo-engineering ‘chemtrails’
9. U.N. discusses plans to reflect the sun to cool the Earth
10. Solar activity may be to blame for unusually cold winters
11. Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
12. Maui residents craft legislation to ban geo-engineering ‘chemtrails’

 

Shrinking Sky! Cloud Tops Dropping Closer to Earth, NASA Satellite Finds

Stephanie Pappas
Live Science
February 23, 20112

The sky is falling… sort of. Over the last 10 years, the height of clouds has been shrinking, according to new research.

The time frame is short, but if future observations show that clouds are truly getting lower, it could have an important effect on global climate change. Clouds that are lower in the atmosphere would allow Earth to cool more efficiently, potentially offsetting some of the warming caused by greenhouse gases.

“We don’t know exactly what causes the cloud heights to lower,” study researcher Roger Davies of the University of Auckland in New Zealand said in a statement. “But it must be due to a change in the circulation patterns that give rise to cloud formation at high altitude.”

Clouds are a wildcard in understanding Earth’s climate. Ephemeral as they are, they’re difficult to track over time, and factors such as height and location make a big difference in whether clouds will slow the effects of global warming or exacerbate them. And no one fully understands how clouds will respond to a warming climate.

Full story here.

 

Concern now growing that a small but influential group of scientists and their backers, are having a disproportionate effect on major decisions about geoengineering research and policy

John Vidal
Guardian
February 8, 2012

A small group of leading climate scientists, financially supported by billionaires including Bill Gates, are lobbying governments and international bodies to back experiments into manipulating the climate on a global scale to avoid catastrophic climate change.

The scientists, who advocate geoengineering methods such as spraying millions of tonnes of reflective particles of sulphur dioxide 30 miles above earth, argue that a “plan B” for climate change will be needed if the UN and politicians cannot agree to making the necessary cuts in greenhouse gases, and say the US government and others should pay for a major programme of international research.

Solar geoengineering techniques are highly controversial: while some climate scientists believe they may prove a quick and relatively cheap way to slow global warming, others fear that when conducted in the upper atmosphere, they could irrevocably alter rainfall patterns and interfere with the earth’s climate.

Geoengineering is opposed by many environmentalists, who say the technology could undermine efforts to reduce emissions, and by developing countries who fear it could be used as a weapon or by rich countries to their advantage. In 2010, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity declared a moratorium on experiments in the sea and space, except for small-scale scientific studies.

Read full report here

HEADLINE NEWS LINKS

1. Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering
2. Scientists say hackers skewed climate-change emails
3. Inhofe Weighs Criminal Probe of Scientists’ Climate Change E-Mails
4. Scientists Admit Climate Cooled in the Last Decade, Cite Sulfur Pollution from China
5. CIA Teams Up With Climate Scientists
6. Climate Emails Stoke Debate
7. Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
8. Another “Snow Job” as British Committee Clears Climate Gate Scientists of Wrongdoing
9. Stern backs $100bn IMF climate fund plan
10. Cancun climate change summit: scientists call for rationing in developed world
11. Climate skeptics claim leaked emails are evidence of collusion among scientists
12. Russians confirm that UK climate scientists manipulated data to exaggerate global warming

 

Ethan A. Huff
Natural News
February 8, 2012

(NaturalNews) The latest scam to enter the debate about so-called “global warming” involves spending billions of dollars to spray the atmosphere with tiny particulate matter for the alleged purpose of reflecting sunlight back into space, and thus cooling the planet. But research into this controversial practice of “chemtrailing,” which has actually already been going on for quite some time now, is largely funded directly by Mr. Vaccine himself, the infamous Bill Gates.

The U.K.’s Guardian paper reports that Gates, who is a huge advocate of global intervention programs that forcibly affect large people groups whether they like it or not, has been spending untold millions of dollars from his own personal fortune to fund research into geo-engineering programs. These funds are being used to study things like how much it will cost every year to blast the skies with tiny particles of sulfur dioxide, a toxic industrial byproduct linked to serious respiratory illnesses like asthma (http://www.epa.gov/air/sulfurdioxide/).

Gates and his small cadre of allies, which include co-founder of Skype Niklas Zennstrom and owner of the Virgin Group Sir Richard Branson, reportedly spend exorbitant amounts of cash every year trying to push geo-engineering initiative across the globe. They claim that if nations like the U.S. will not cut greenhouse gas emissions by tremendous amounts, the spraying of toxic poisons into the atmosphere will be necessary to thwart impending disaster.

The entire concept of geo-engineering to save the planet is utter hogwash, of course. This is true not only because “global warming” itself has proven to be a man-made scam, but also because literally blocking sunlight for the stated purpose of reflecting the warmth of its rays back into space makes no logical or scientific sense.

Geo-engineering does, however, give unprecedented control over the world’s weather patterns to a select few, allowing them to manipulate the environment for their own gain in the name of saving the planet. And blocking the sun’s rays with tiny particles also serves much more sinister purposes like preventing humans from absorbing much-needed ultraviolet B (UVB) rays from the sun, which are responsible for producing vitamin D in the body (http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/).

But while chemtrail advocates like Bill Gates act as though these poison plumes are a potential future intervention, evidence already points to the fact that chemtrails have already been in use for many years now. Be sure to check out the film What in the World are They Spraying? for more shocking information about chemtrails:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf0khstYDLA

Sources for this article include:

http://www.guardian.co.uk

1. Chemtrails: What In The World Are They Spraying?
2. ‘Flying syringe’ mosquitos, other ideas get Gates funding
3. Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus
4. Bill Gates Pours Millions Into Geoengineering
5. Bill Gates’ School Crusade
6. Bill Gates funds technology to destroy your sperm
7. Bill Gates says U.S. recovery to take years, taxes rise
8. Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
9. Bill Gates buys positive press spin on vaccines, GMOs
10. Bill Gates wants to register all new babies on the planet for vaccines
11. Pilot Films Jet Spraying Chemtrails
12. Bill Gates pushes for 90 percent vaccination rate worldwide

 

Billionaire funds projects aimed at injecting upper atmosphere with sulphur particles

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, February 6, 2012

Microsoft founder Bill Gates continues to pour millions of dollars into high-risk geoengineering projects that purport to offer a solution to global warming yet have been savaged by environmentalists as potentially posing a greater threat than climate change itself.

“Concern is now growing that the small but influential group of scientists, and their backers, may have a disproportionate effect on major decisions about geoengineering research and policy,” reports the London Guardian, quoting critics who allege that Gates’ funding has enabled geoengineering advocates to “dominate the deliberations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

In 2010, Gates was criticized for ploughing $300,000 dollars into a sea trial of cloud-whitening technology which involved spraying clouds with microscopic particles in an effort to make them reflect more sunlight, an experiment dubbed “dangerous” by environmental campaigners.

The report reveals that Gates has backed Professors David Keith, of Harvard University, and Ken Caldeira of Stanford, to the tune of $4.6 million dollars to fund studies based around the premise of injecting sulphur particles into the upper atmosphere designed to reflect sunlight.

As we have previously documented, experiments similar to Caldeira’s proposal are already being carried out by U.S. government -backed scientists, such as those at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in Aiken, S.C, who in 2009 began conducting studies which involved shooting huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass microspheres,” into the stratosphere.

Exposure to sulphur has been linked to innumerable physical and neurological diseases, including reproductive failure, behavioral changes, damage to the immune system, as well as liver, heart and stomach disorders.

Even pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits that injecting sulphur into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain, ozone depletion or weather pattern disruption.”

Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock also, “created computer simulations indicating that sulfate clouds could potentially weaken the Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain that irrigates the food crops of billions of people.”

The Guardian report reveals that Gates’ money is being spent by the scientists involved on lobbying governments to provide huge public funding for massive geoengineering experiments, despite opposition from prominent environmentalists who warn that the potential dangers are immense.

“The eco-clique are lobbying for a huge injection of public funds into geoengineering research. They dominate virtually every inquiry into geoengineering. They are present in almost all of the expert deliberations. They have been the leading advisers to parliamentary and congressional inquiries and their views will, in all likelihood, dominate the deliberations of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as it grapples for the first time with the scientific and ethical tangle that is climate engineering,” said Clive Hamilton, professor of Public Ethics at the Australian National University.

Increasing awareness of the chemtrail phenomenon has led many to speculate that massive geoengineering projects are already underway.

In 2008, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.

The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.” The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very unusual,” but commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter” in its discussion with KSLA.

The lucrative push for research grants related to geoengineering remains intense despite new figures from the UK Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit confirming that the planet has not warmed since 1997 and in fact the real climate threat could be the onset of a new ice age.

HEADLINE NEWS LINKS

1. Geoengineering Conference To Discuss Blocking Sun
2. CFR on Planetary Geoengineering: “Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere”
3. Geoengineering: Our Environment Under Attack
4. Bill Gates Confronted on Eugenics by We Are Change
5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Gave Millions to La Raza
6. Colossal GeoEngineering in Plain Sight
7. Concerns About Chemtrails Given Fresh Impetus
8. Scientists to Create “Artificial Volcano” In Bid to Geoengineer Climate
9. Bill Gates funds technology to destroy your sperm
10. Bill Gates’ School Crusade
11. Government Scientists Propose “Geo-Engineering” Earth’s Upper Atmosphere
12. Bill Gates to sign off at Microsoft

 

We Are Change San Francisco
May 10, 2011

A We Are Change San Francisco member taped the following event on April 21, 2011 at the San Francisco Public Library. Geo engineering (chemtrails) were stated as an axiom with this panel of scientists and several members of Wac SF confronted the scientists afterwards. One such confrontation was that of John Fitzgerald who ran for Congress and Mayor of Martinez, California on a 911 truth and End the Fed platform.

 read more ...