Get Adobe Flash player
You are here:FEATURED STORIES > Police use backyards to train dogs

Can the Police and Government grasp what are Concept of Property Rights.

Concept of property rights may come naturally to preschoolers - Saturday, June 25, 2011

Bruce Bower
ScienceNews
June 24, 2011

Editor’s note: If kids get it, why not politicians and police?

Young children are possessed by possessions. Preschoolers argue about what belongs to whom with annoying regularity, a habit that might suggest limited appreciation of what it means to own something.

But it’s actually just the opposite, psychologist Ori Friedman of the University of Waterloo in Canada reported on May 28 at the Association for Psychological Science annual meeting. At ages 4 and 5, youngsters value a person’s ownership rights — say, to a crayon — far more strongly than adults do, Friedman and psychology graduate student Karen Neary found.

Rather than being learned from parents, a concept of property rights may automatically grow out of 2- to 3-year-olds’ ideas about bodily rights, such as assuming that another person can’t touch or control one’s body for no reason, Friedman proposed.

Read more


 

Police use backyards to train dogs

By Sandra McCulloch, Times Colonist

Nanaimo residents have voiced concerns over the RCMP using their backyards without permission to train police dogs.

The B.C. Civil Liberties Association has complained about the practice to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP.

"In the absence of consent, statutory authority or other legal justification, the intrusion of RCMP onto private property for a purpose not authorized by the homeowner constitutes trespass and is illegal under provincial law in British Columbia," association executive director David Eby wrote in the complaint.

Roger and Cindy Smith notified the association after they saw an RCMP dog and seven or eight police officers run through their Lantzville yard at noon on May 25.

"I didn't know who it was but one of the men did have 'Police' written on the front and back of his shirt," Roger Smith said Wednesday.

"I understood that police didn't have the right to just walk on your property."

The Smiths' Belgian shepherd was inside at the time but wouldn't have taken kindly to a police dog on the property, he said.

"It was such a shock, you have this posse suddenly showing up in your backyard," Smith said.

They were in pale blue uniforms "and could have been from the correctional centre, that was my concern," Smith said.

Nobody came to the front door to give a warning prior to the training exercise, he said. "When [the police] ran up the garden, they had no idea what they would see in the backyard - there could have been kids out playing. It seems they are pushing Murphy's law to the extent that somebody is going to get hurt," he said.

In response to their concerns, Nanaimo RCMP Sgt. Sheryl Armstrong responded by email that the dog handler didn't break the law.

While a search warrant is required for police to enter a private dwelling to search for items used in the commission of an offence, Armstrong said because the dog was on a training exercise, there was no need for a legal request to enter the property.

"During the course of this training exercise, the police officers did not commit a provincial nor federal offence," she wrote in an email excerpt included in Eby's complaint.

The dog handler usually contacts residents in advance to let them know a dog-training exercise may involve police entering their property, said Armstrong.

"In this case [the dog handler] was under the mistaken impression no one was home. Once he realized his error, he returned to explain what transpired."

A call to Nanaimo RCMP Wednesday was not returned.

Ruth Thomson lives three doors away from the Nanaimo RCMP station.

"They are not good neighbours," she said Wednesday.

"I've had at least four times when they've gone through my yard with the dog. There's never any warning."

smcculloch@timescolonist.com

  

Mounties probing Surrey Six case facing 20 criminal charges

Mounties probing Surrey Six case facing 20 criminal charges - Saturday, June 25, 2011
By Kim Bolan, Postmedia News
June 23, 2011

Jamie Bacon is one of four people charged with first-degree murder in the Surrey Six massacre. Now, four RCMP officers face a total of 20 criminal charges for their conduct in the Surrey Six case.

Jamie Bacon is one of four people charged with first-degree murder in the Surrey Six massacre. Now, four RCMP officers face a total of 20 criminal charges for their conduct in the Surrey Six case.

Photograph by: Vancouver Sun, Vancouver Sun

VANCOUVER — Four RCMP officers working on the Surrey Six murder case are facing a total of 20 criminal charges after one of them was accused of having an improper affair with a potential witness in the case.

Sgt. Derek Brassington, the officer at the centre of the controversy, is facing seven charges, including breach of trust, obstruction of justice and fraud, claiming expenses to which he was not entitled and compromising and endangering the witness.

His supervisor at the time, Insp. Dave Attew, is facing six counts, including breach of trust and fraud and compromising the safety of a witness.

Two other offers, Paul Johnson and Danny Michaud, have been charged with breach of trust, obstruction of justice and misleading investigators from the Ontario Provincial Police who were looking into the accusations against Brassington.

Special prosecutor Chris Considine recommended the charges after reviewing the investigation done by the OPP.

Considine, a Victoria lawyer, was appointed in November of last year to decide what should be done with the OPP's findings.

RCMP Chief Supt. Janice Armstrong said Thursday that she is "deeply disappointed in the alleged actions of the officers involved."

"The investigators charged in this case were senior, experienced and trusted police officers. Their alleged behaviour is completely contrary to the RCMP's core values, and falls well below the standard the public expects from us," Armstrong said.

All four officers have been suspended with pay, but Armstrong said a move is underway to change that status to suspended without pay.

They could still be called as witnesses in the Surrey Six trial of four men charged with first-degree murder in the gangland slaying of six in a Surrey, B.C. highrise in October 2007.

Armstrong said it will ultimately be up to a court to decide if the criminal charges against the officers impacts their credibility on the stand.

"Crown counsel on the Surrey Six homicides has been informed of the alleged actions of our police officers, and has indicated there will be no change to the decision to prosecute those charged with the homicides," Armstrong said.

She said the families of all six victims, which included two innocent bystanders, were told of the charges.

"There's no question this is the last thing these families should have had to deal with, in the context of the murder of their loved ones," she said.

Allegations of the alleged affair between Brassington and the witness were made to the RCMP in December 2009, Armstrong said.

"As the internal investigation progressed it was determined that there was likely evidence to support the allegations and the RCMP announced the investigation to the public in January 2010," she said.

The OPP was called in that February and was "given a wide mandate and unfettered access to all material, equipment, information and personnel involved in this file," Armstrong said, thanking the agency for its work.

Brassington was suspended in April 2010, followed by Attew in June 2010. The other two were put on paid leave last fall, Armstrong said.

"I want to be clear — the alleged behaviours are absolutely unacceptable and show poor decision making. What is alleged to have occurred was a breach of policy, protocol and the law. And fundamentally, it was an abuse of the trust the public places in police," Armstrong told reporters.

She agreed the charges against four others could affect the public's trust in the RCMP. But she said people should understand that the charges also indicate the force has no tolerance for misconduct and takes allegations seriously.

Armstrong said while the victims' families and general public are concerned about the charges, so too are the other investigators who have spent years working on the case.

"So many investigators, specialized support units like forensics and others have poured their hearts into and devoted years to the Surrey Six investigation," she said. "I know they're committed to supporting Crown counsel as they move ahead with the prosecution of those believed to be responsible for the murders."

No specific details about the evidence against the four officers was released. Armstrong said it would be inappropriate to comment on it given the matter is now before the courts. And the special prosecutor also indicated he would not comment for the same reason. All four officers are expected to make their first appearances in Surrey provincial court on July 11.

Considine's mandate included conducting an independent charge review of the OPP's Report to Crown Counsel and "making the charging decision he deems appropriate in the exercise of his independent prosecutorial discretion," offering legal advice to the OPP if further investigation is deemed necessary, providing a written report to the assistant deputy attorney general and conducting the prosecution if charges are laid.

Five men are charged in connection with the gangland-style execution of six people in a Surrey highrise in October 2007.

Jamie Bacon, Matt Johnson, Cody Haevischer and Michael Le are facing first-degree-murder charges in the case, while another suspect, Sophon Sek, is facing a manslaughter charge in connection with the deaths.