Political Commentary and Opinion
Dear Dishonorable Mr. Burnyeat:
March 27, 2002
Re: File 99 0118
My name is Salvatore Cino and I appeared in front of you on the issue of Child Custody in March 2002.
I was unable to stay In Victoria B.C., due to my fathers ill health and had to return to Hamilton as soon as possible. I did receive your honor's memorandum stating, that I was to have supervised access to my child by my ex-wife and her witnesses, ten days after the memorandum was put forth. I can not in good faith accept this Injustice you have put forth so I can be set up again..
I would like to point out I was false accused by my Ex-wife and you never even took that matter into account.
As for your memorandum, I must state very clearly Mrs. Cino made those allegations of sexual abuse. I was and have never been Charged let a lone receive a fair hearing on this matter, which your courts didn't care if I was innocence or not.
Now you, your honor have stated, I Salvatore Cino is not or to be allowed to have any witness while my ex-wife supervises myself with my child. This is not only a slap in my face, but is nothing but another abusive attack on my Canadian Charter of Rights.
This ex-wife is all so to have as many witnesses as she likes and is to supervise me with my child. This is just plain out right stupidity on your part to even suggesting this setup. My ex-wife could claim anything, as her witnesses could to set me up for further abuse and violation on my rights as a father and an Canadian as well as being charged.. "These allegations and your ruling would have myself criminal charged."
I believe by your actions on this case that "Morally, a Judge who uses his professional competence for anything except a disinterested search for truth is guilty of a kind of treachery."
I was not giving the opportunity to speak of what other judges stated on this matter " Custody" by Judge Owenflood. Due to the fact that your honor disallowed everything to be " presumed", done to me right or wrong was irrelevant to my case. If truth is not allowed to be told, and only lies are accepted in your court room, then you sir are a disgrace to the bench.
(Transcript before Honourable Judge Owen Flood: Oct 14 1999 ("if these allegations are totally false and are simply being used criminally as weapon, then that seems to me to be something that bears upon custody, that could well bear upon custody being granted to the father.") "But I am gravely concerned that this child is just a shuttlecock, it may well be an abused shuttlecock. I do not know. I am gravely concerned about the way this_ _ about the way this file and the previous history of a contempt.")
In any event, I was not guilty of anything and was cleared of any wrong doing to my child by : police, doctors and my child, and you have allowed my child to be abused on every level sir. Your honor Judge Burnyeat I am not a criminal, you have indeed treated me as a criminal. And for that you should be ashamed of yourself.
By allowing my access to my child to be supervised by my ex-wife, is not only outrages myself but this is the same person who placed a false sexual allegation against me. I found the memorandum to be very criminal in nature and does indeed jeopardizing to my well being as a person.
You sir have not put my child best interest forth but have endangered my Childs life with abuse. Is there something your honor does not understand about false sexual allegations or is it you devote your time to feminist and their agenda's.
Since I am not in Victoria to have access to my child nor do I wish to be abused by you or your courts again, or my ex-wife and her friends.
I would very much like to see my child, but not under your conditions you have set. Also I now feel child support payments will stop, as I feel you and your kangaroo court just made a mockery out of my rights and my child's rights to see that the truth is told.
Four weeks that I spent in Victoria I had no access to my child what so ever!!
I am still making child support payments for a child I have no access to, "not any more that's for sure".
One day you will wake up and get your head out of the clouds, and see how many children you have abused, but by then it might be to late for all those children you denied to fathers, all for the sake of Feminist garbage.
"For 5 years my child and I have been put through a living hell" I thought you would like to hear it one more time. If you become angry with this statement i suggest you get anger management. If suspicious or caution lingers in your brain: it should be that all fathers who are accused on hearsay should get automatic custody of their children and that children be denied any access to their mothers, family judges and children aid society!!! since 90% of the allegations are false. What a way to make a living off the backs of children. You judges disgust me !!!
Salvatore Cino God bless our children
Response back BC Court Judge Romilly from Miss Morgan
The Judges responses: The Honourable Mr. Justice Romilly and The Honourable Owen Flood response back to Miss Morgan
The Supreme Court of BC Judge's Response Back
An Objection to Miss Morgan's Letter, and any communication going directly to the Judges. Further that It was Improper for this matter to be addressed by a letter when it should have been addressed back in court. This letter itself is nothing but contempt of court, pertaining to a section 15 of the FRA.
More of the Government's Improper actions
Objection Letter from Lawyer
Objection to Miss Moron's Letter
Complaint to Law Society and Ombudsman office
The Ministry of Children and Families Letter on the Complaint to the Ombudsman's office
A Joke, Big Time by these MCF terrorists Doing nothing but Paper Apprehensions because they feel their above the Law.
A Witch Hunt of the worst kind.
The Ministry of Children and Families sent a letter to Mrs. Cino that basically said that Mrs. Cino is not to give Salvatore Cino access to his child, even though there a court order in place for access. another act of terrorism!
Note: that the Ministry's lawyer Ms. Karen Henry, stood up before the court and advised the Judge that it was the ministry's position that if Ms. Cino permitted any access at all, they would apprehend the child. This is a clear an unequivocal threat.
First The Letter M.C.F. gave to Mrs. Cino
This is the Ministry of Children and Family's Letter and the false allegations used.
While failing to abide by a court order.
The Ministry of Children and Families sent a letter to Mrs. Cino that basically said that Mrs. Cino is not to give Salvatore Cino access to his child, even though there a court order in place for access.
These Court Documents are the proceedings at hearing, surrounding that letter the Ministry of C/F sent to Mrs. Cino, to help deny Sal access to his child again, based on this so called abuse. The Judge does get upset though at the Ministry of Children and Families, and threatens to hold the ministry of child and familys in contempt of court.
That matter of the Letter came back before Mr. Justice Owen Flood, who was serious offended by the fact that the Ministry of C. F. thought they could usurp what is in essence a matter of Judicial Power.
Frankie Williams (RCPM,CR ) states there is no intent on the Director's part to act above the law, but in fact they do all the time to keep fathers out of the picture.