Get Adobe Flash player
You are here:FEATURED STORIES > Fluoride removal debate heats up

Calgary and how Fluoridation kills you

Fluoride removal debate heats up

Last Updated: Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Dentists offer fluoride treatments to the surface of teeth.
Dentists offer fluoride treatments to the surface of teeth

The latest move in a long-simmering debate across the country on fluoridation is happening in Calgary. Wednesday's day-long consultation by Calgary city council is on an issue other Canadian municipalities have faced. Waterloo, Ont., for example no longer adds fluoride to its water supply. Less than half of the city's population of 500,000 turned out to vote on the issue last summer, the anti-fluoride side won by a slim margin. "Since there's so many ways to access fluoride, why do you need to have it the water?" asked Blaine Grey, a 53-year-old father who went door to door to campaign against fluoridation.

Fluoridation first started in Canada 60 years ago. Forty-five per cent of Canadians drink fluoridated water, Health Canada said in 2007, the latest national figures available. Dentists and authorities such as Health Canada and the World Health Organization that support fluoridation say adding the mineral to water protects teeth.

They say community water fluoridation is a safe and effective way to reach everyone particularly children's teeth as they develop. "It is part of our equitable treatment of our population" said Dr. Lynn Tompkins, president of the Ontario Dental Association. "Getting fluoride in the drinking water does help all of the vulnerable population, as well as healthy populations." But those against fluoridation say the cavity protection practice risks fluorosis, a condition where tiny stains or pits appear on teeth if too much fluoride is ingested.

Fluoride choice

Aside from drinking water, fluoride is also available in toothpastes and mouthwashes. That's why dentists take care to educate parents about the correct amount of toothpaste to use on the brush, proper brushing habits, and the idea of spitting afterwards, Tompkins said. The opponents believe there's a risk of more serious health problems though that has never been conclusively proven in a medical study. Dr. Robert Dickson, a family physician in Calgary leading the city's anti-fluoride campaign, argues it is better to let citizens choose how much fluoride they get, rather than administering it to everyone in drinking water. "Let's put it on there with brushing," Dickson suggested. "Let's put it on at the dentist if you choose. Let's not put it inside our bodies where it doesn't work." Better dental care, such as fluoridated toothpaste, better diets that include more calcium and phosphorus are improving dental health rather than fluoridation itself, Dickson said. To date, available evidence shows regions with fluoridation have fewer cavities, though worldwide that gap is closing.

Provincial and territorial estimates of community water fluoridation coverage in 2007
Province/Territory Per cent with fluoridated water
British Columbia 3.7%
Alberta 74.7%
Saskatchewan 36.8%
Manitoba 69.9%
Ontario 75.9%
Quebec 6.4%
New Brunswick 25.9%
Nova Scotia 56.8%
Prince Edward Island 23.7%
Newfoundland and Labrador 1.5%
Nunavut 0.0%
Northwest Territories 56.4%
Yukon 0.0%

Canada

45.1%

 

 
 
Here is the real facts that your Canmadian governments will not tell you...
 
Bombshell: Government Admits Fluoride Hurting Children - Saturday, January 15, 2011

A significant milestone in the fight against fluoride emerged quietly and without major notice from the mainstream news last week. After decades of ignoring the research about the dangers and hailing water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest health achievements of the 20th Century (CDC), the government is calling for a reduction in the amount of fluoride it adds to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). For the first time since 1962, the standard for fluoride will be lowered from 1.2 to 0.7 milligrams per liter....

Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, January 15, 2011

A significant milestone in the fight against fluoride emerged quietly and without major notice from the mainstream news last week. After decades of ignoring the research about the dangers and hailing water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest health achievements of the 20th Century (CDC), the government is calling for a reduction in the amount of fluoride it adds to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). For the first time since 1962, the standard for fluoride will be lowered from 1.2 to 0.7 milligrams per liter.



Because fluoride from water builds up over time in the human body, this reduction will not eliminate the dangers of fluoride– which include risk of
bone cancer, bone fractures, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation, lowered IQ and mental functions, sterility or reduced fertility and more. However, it is a good sign that the powers-that-be are losing ground on the fluoride debate. Further, the reduction of fluoridation is proof that the warnings from activists, critics and health professionals have been heard after all.

As Alex Jones points out in the video, many of those health professionals who have been blowing the whistle on fluoridation for decades are employees or union contractors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other governmental regulation agencies. Their objections, based on alarming scientific studies such as the one linking fluoridation with a seven-fold increase in bone cancer for boys, have heretofore been almost wholly ignored, until now. One reason for this government admission, by the way, likely has to do with limiting liability for those harmful effects, or even establishing immunity for districts who adhere to lowering the fluoride standard against future claims to harm.

At the same time, hundreds of other chemicals including many toxic ingredients like lead, arsenic, radium and uranium are also found in public drinking water. Many of these dangerous toxins are put into the water as part of the fluoride-cocktail administered in the many municipalities across the United States and other Western countries, or are leached into the supply via the acidic levels of fluoride. The compound is often not simply sodium fluoride, but a mix of toxic waste byproduct [see chart for hydrofluosilicic acid] created in the process of scrubbing phosphate fertilizer plants and in other high industry applications, such as aluminum.

Furthermore, while fluoride is scheduled for reduction in public water supplies, it is still very common and often dangerously concentrated in many food products at levels of many more parts per million than water and in pesticides used for food production, and in the soils where those pesticides are used.

Though these other fluoride dangers are significant enough that we need to continue educating and informing our fellow friends, neighbors and families, those who have long spoken out about this issue can cherish one victory on the road to taking back our nation, our lives and our health. Now, with this important government admission, we must push for complete removal of added fluoride from public water in our areas.

Further, as advisors to government bodies around the world attempt to argue for forced mass-medication by adding substances like lithium to public water, we must argue against ‘forced consent’ and demand one of our most integral human rights– that no government of man can make a law to force medicate us against our will. We have a human right to say no, especially when we know better

 read more ...