Black Robed Cult
It is demanded of judges to master these four qualities: independence,
impartiality, fairness, and competence.
What we have witnessed in practice is gross incompetence, profound bias,
and predilection towards legislation at the cost of fundamental principles
and absolute rights.
Some Rights arising out of our British Anglo-Saxon heritage are: All people
are by nature free and independent, and have certain inalienable rights,
among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring,
possessing, and protecting property; and pursuing and obtaining safety,
happiness, and privacy. (English Common Law.)
From the Magna Charta (1215): The right to be not jailed or fined by the
court except by the word of two or more witnesses who come under their name
(not as an officer), or by the law of the land, which refers to the
Anglo-Saxon Common Law. The forbidding of an officer of the "Crown" to lay
charges (pleas) in the court. The protection against false charges and the
right to a trial by a jury of peers (a.k.a. good men/women of the town one
resides). The right of access to the justice system, and to our rights. The
right not to be outlawed except by your actions of maliciously doing damage
to another person and/or their property and by a jury of peers. Outlawed
means to be out of the protection of common law justice and common law
rights, which most Acts of parliament violate.
Right to travel, which in essence is the right to go to church, or use the
highways to take one's goods or produce to or from market. There are many
other rights and freedoms that can be identified with these that are rapidly
being eroded and crushed under the steam roller some have irreverently
referred to as the 'New World Order'.
As Commonwealth Citizens, we have lost many of our absolute or basic rights
by the devious tactics promoted by the international banks, and put in place
by their lackey traitorous lawyer politicians and, by so-called "laws"
enacted by the black-robed thugs and traitors of the judiciary.
You need to be aware that the black robes you see parading around our
courthouses have in their direct ancestry the cannibal (human flesh-eating
priests of Baal) cult priests of Molech who measured out their weird sense
of justice to the peasant classes and slaves of the Roman Empire while
burning their infants in sacrificial fires. This cult came into the Roman
Empire, and thus, London through the Phoenicians originating as the
Canaanites of ancient Palestine. Now you should understand why we have had
the imposition of Roman Law - the legal system of despots, etc., etc.; and,
all this without benefit or control of duly elected legislators.
The Saxon common law provided justice through the jury system. The court
represented the dead, "imbeciles", and infants (ages 0 through 18) and
crimes against the common good (the realm). The alleged crime was presented
to a "Grand Jury" (25 people) (Magna Charta s. 20) who decided upon the
authenticity of the claim and who laid the charge if warranted (indictment).
It was the sheriff's responsibility to call the juries (petty and grand), to
keep order in a court, and carry out the orders of the court. The sheriff
was completely independent of other political bodies.
The jurisprudence course should contain a good working knowledge of
Anglo-Saxon Common Law and judges should be required to maintain the intent
and philosophical reason of that legal system. In Canada, our Judges are
required to make an oath to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and a duty to
uphold the law she oversees for the benefit of all freemen and commoners.
(As you can clearly see from 'Appeal Court Judgment' these parasite judges
think nothing of breaking their sacred oath to the laws of the Sovereign.)
Our money system was replaced by international bankers with debt paper known
as the Versailles or Breton Woods system. This system has been used by
plunderers of nations and empires since antiquity. The basis of the system
is usury or interest. A reasonable amount of interest is acceptable when
property is leased for another to use; however, the banks lend or lease
nothing to the Government, except a number in a computer. They extract
plunder through income and other taxes, control and strip our raw materials,
and even control food and manufactured goods (the basic needs of everyday
life.)
Legislatures have used "assumpsit's contract" as a primary means to deprive
all of us of our basic rights. A contract is a vehicle for the exchange of
property. Property can be Real (land, house, etc.), Chattel (car, clothing,
jewellery, etc.), and/or Personal (labour, skills, intellectual knowledge,
etc.). Normally, a contract has to be in writing or witnessed if it's a
verbal contract; and, terms have to be fully revealed and understandable to
all parties involved to be valid. English law made provision for
"un-witnessed" contracts by applying a common sense approach to the
circumstances surrounding the exchange, or intended exchange of property.
This was called "assumpsit" (assumed). If it walks like a duck, quacks like
a duck, it must be a duck.
How was this used to deprive Canadians of their rights? Government Acts,
such as the Income Tax (1917) and subsequent Income Tax Acts, Motor Vehicle
Acts, Marriage Acts, and countless others were written to be
"constitutional" and in compliance to the non-violation of rights; but with
a trap for the unwary (most of us). They only make decisions based upon
arguments presented. The contract issue versus the Law of the Land, or the
intent of the Law of the Land has always been excluded from such cases.
Special definitions were written into those Acts that precluded "natural
persons"; but, if one assumed, by his common (generic) understanding of
certain words that he were liable for or covered by the requirements of that
Act and did certain things, he would unknowingly make a contract (an
assumpsit contract) placing himself under the requirements of that Act.
The three Acts we will concentrate on here seem the most abusive now:
(1.) The Income Tax Act uses a special definition for "person." If a person
assumes that he is covered by that definition and files an income tax return
and pays an income tax, he becomes a legal entity called a "taxpayer" and is
subject to the Income Tax Act and Regulations. These are the terms of the
contract, and rights or laws have no bearing on your relations with Revenue
Canada. [See Detax Canada for more insight]
A permit means permission from an owner of property to use his/her property
for their purposes - private or commercial. A license is a waiver of
prosecution for doing something unlawful. The statutory law concerning [that
license] is the terms of the license contract. For a permit, one may, or may
not have to pay something for that use, since the owner may sell or give
away his property. A permit tells others that you have a right to use
someone else's property and it is proof that a contract is in place. The
owner of the property may explain certain terms for the use and care of his
property while you are using it. Those terms become the terms of the
contract in the issue of a permit.
(2.) The original licensing of a motor vehicle operator was for one who used
the highways to make a commercial living; although, the language of the
statutory law would leave one to believe that "proficiency" was the issue.
If that were the issue, proficiency certificates would have been in order -
not licenses; however, proficiency certificates don't imply a contract - or
indicate a signed confession of guilt for doing something unlawful.
Obviously, the latter was the real aim of licenses - the outlawing of the
license applicant so that military or admiralty law could be imposed instead
of the cumbersome (to the politicians with an agenda) common law.
Travel upon the highways was without toll or post; however, the government
could extract a rental or lease payment from those who used public property
to make their living. Remember, public property is the people's property
held in trust under the name of "the Crown". The trickery has been the
people's acceptance of driver's licenses, which puts them under assumpsit's
contract and the use and rental agreement originally meant for commercial
drivers. The Roman or Napoleonic legal system (guilty until you prove your
innocence, charges by police, fines going to the government as a form of
taxation, forced purchase of insurance, etc.) is built into the Motor
Vehicle Acts and becomes the terms of the contract. There may not be
anything wrong with a need for a driving proficiency exam and a presentable
certificate of proficiency; but, there is no need whatsoever for a driver's
license. Why would or should one need a license from some bureaucrat to use
one's own property, the public roads? Fuel taxes pay for highways five times
over!
(3.) Under what circumstances does the state get into the licensing of
marriage? The government has the responsibility to maintain permanent
records of marriages and witness the verbal contract between marriage
partners (solemnization). Until recent times, marriages were recorded in
Family Bibles. Natural people belonged to the Creator; and, it was in His
Church that permission was granted to a man and woman to produce new
offspring for "His Glory within the Holy Sacrament of matrimony". When did
the State government assume the role of Creator? What has taken place under
this scheme of the Socialist International is that by a couple accepting a
State marriage license, all offspring's of that marriage, belongs to the
State government.
Lawful contracts are voidable if the terms were not properly revealed at the
time of the making of the contract or the contract was made and directed by
coercion (threat and fear). Assumpsit's contracts are more difficult to void
as the whole legal system is geared to protect these dastardly incursions
into the people's rights.
Compliance and ignorance of their schemes is their best protection. But as
the 'Appeal Court Ruling' shows, even standing up for your rights in an open
court does not protect the theft of your rights by the Black Robed Cult of
liars and tricksters.
Copyright (c) 2003 BC Revolution. Permission is granted to copy, and
distribute.